347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23355510)
1. Head progression distance in prolonged second stage of labor: relationship with mode of delivery and fetal head station.
Gilboa Y; Kivilevitch Z; Spira M; Kedem A; Katorza E; Moran O; Achiron R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 23355510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound.
Dall'Asta A; Angeli L; Masturzo B; Volpe N; Schera GBL; Di Pasquo E; Girlando F; Attini R; Menato G; Frusca T; Ghi T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):642.e1-642.e13. PubMed ID: 31589867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery?
Kalache KD; Dückelmann AM; Michaelis SA; Lange J; Cichon G; Dudenhausen JW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 19224527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor.
Tutschek B; Torkildsen EA; Eggebø TM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 23371409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor.
Torkildsen EA; Salvesen KÅ; Eggebø TM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):702-8. PubMed ID: 21308837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two-center study.
Eggebø TM; Hassan WA; Salvesen KÅ; Lindtjørn E; Lees CC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 43(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 24105705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal head-symphysis distance: a simple and reliable ultrasound index of fetal head station in labor.
Youssef A; Maroni E; Ragusa A; De Musso F; Salsi G; Iammarino MT; Paccapelo A; Rizzo N; Pilu G; Ghi T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 23124698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fetal head-symphysis distance and mode of delivery in the second stage of labor.
Youssef A; Maroni E; Cariello L; Bellussi F; Montaguti E; Salsi G; Morselli-Labate AM; Paccapelo A; Rizzo N; Pilu G; Ghi T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Oct; 93(10):1011-7. PubMed ID: 25040777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of the angle of progression in the prediction of the outcome of occiput posterior position in the second stage of labor.
Brunelli E; Youssef A; Soliman EM; Del Prete B; Mahmoud MH; Fikry M; Pilu G; Kamel RA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jul; 225(1):81.e1-81.e9. PubMed ID: 33508312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
Tse WT; Chaemsaithong P; Chan WWY; Kwan AHW; Huang J; Appiah K; Chong KC; Poon LC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):335.e1-335.e18. PubMed ID: 31153931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sonographic prediction of outcome of vacuum deliveries: a multicenter, prospective cohort study.
Kahrs BH; Usman S; Ghi T; Youssef A; Torkildsen EA; Lindtjørn E; Østborg TB; Benediktsdottir S; Brooks L; Harmsen L; Romundstad PR; Salvesen KÅ; Lees CC; Eggebø TM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):69.e1-69.e10. PubMed ID: 28327433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pubic arch angle in prolonged second stage of labor: clinical significance.
Gilboa Y; Kivilevitch Z; Spira M; Kedem A; Katorza E; Moran O; Achiron R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):442-6. PubMed ID: 23001876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurement of angle of progression and head-perineum distance with correlation to conventional clinical parameters of labor progress and time to delivery.
Chan YT; Ng VK; Yung WK; Lo TK; Leung WC; Lau WL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Aug; 28(12):1476-81. PubMed ID: 25163523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Ultrasound in monitoring of the second stage of labour].
Fouché CJ; Simon EG; Potin J; Perrotin F
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Nov; 40(11):658-65. PubMed ID: 23099031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head progression in active second stage of labor and mode of delivery.
Ghi T; Youssef A; Maroni E; Arcangeli T; De Musso F; Bellussi F; Nanni M; Giorgetta F; Morselli-Labate AM; Iammarino MT; Paccapelo A; Cariello L; Rizzo N; Pilu G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):430-5. PubMed ID: 23288706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery.
Ghi T; Maroni E; Youssef A; Morselli-Labate AM; Paccapelo A; Montaguti E; Rizzo N; Pilu G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 24496823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors that affect ultrasound-determined labor progress in women undergoing induction of labor.
Chaemsaithong P; Kwan AHW; Tse WT; Lim WT; Chan WWY; Chong KC; Leung TY; Poon LC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 220(6):592.e1-592.e15. PubMed ID: 30735668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Descent of fetal head during active pushing: secondary analysis of prospective cohort study investigating ultrasound examination before operative vaginal delivery.
Kahrs BH; Usman S; Ghi T; Youssef A; Torkildsen EA; Lindtjørn E; Østborg TB; Benediktsdottir S; Brooks L; Harmsen L; Salvesen KÅ; Lees CC; Eggebø TM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 54(4):524-529. PubMed ID: 31115115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the learning curves of digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position during labor.
Rozenberg P; Porcher R; Salomon LJ; Boirot F; Morin C; Ville Y
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 18307213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of selected ultrasonography parameters in the second stage of labor in prediction mode of delivery.
Ciaciura-Jarno M; Cnota W; Wójtowicz D; Niesłuchowska-Hoxha A; Ruci A; Kierach R; Stępień A; Nowak A; Sodowska P
Ginekol Pol; 2016; 87(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 27418223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
