347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23355510)
21. Intrapartum ultrasound at the initiation of the active second stage of labor predicts spontaneous vaginal delivery.
Hadad S; Oberman M; Ben-Arie A; Sacagiu M; Vaisbuch E; Levy R
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100249. PubMed ID: 33451615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor.
Sherer DM; Miodovnik M; Bradley KS; Langer O
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):264-8. PubMed ID: 11896948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Descent of the presenting part assessed with ultrasound.
Eggebø TM; Hjartardottir H
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; 230(3S):S901-S912. PubMed ID: 34461079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sonographic measurement of cervical length and head perineum distance before labor to predict time of delivery.
Chan YTV; Lau KW; Hui W; Lau CH; Leung WC; Lau WL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):4905-4909. PubMed ID: 33455498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound.
Ghi T; Farina A; Pedrazzi A; Rizzo N; Pelusi G; Pilu G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 19202576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Can ultrasound on admission in active labor predict labor duration and a spontaneous delivery?
Hjartardóttir H; Lund SH; Benediktsdóttir S; Geirsson RT; Eggebø TM
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Sep; 3(5):100383. PubMed ID: 33901721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fetal molding examined with transperineal ultrasound and associations with position and delivery mode.
Iversen JK; Kahrs BH; Torkildsen EA; Eggebø TM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 223(6):909.e1-909.e8. PubMed ID: 32585224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Uncertain fetal head engagement: a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing digital exam with angle of progression.
Haumonte JB; Blanc J; Castel P; Mace P; Auquier P; d'Ercole C; Bretelle F
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 227(4):625.e1-625.e8. PubMed ID: 35452654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound.
Barbera AF; Pombar X; Perugino G; Lezotte DC; Hobbins JC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 19248000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. New technique for automatic sonographic measurement of change in head-perineum distance and angle of progression during active phase of second stage of labor.
Angeli L; Conversano F; Dall'Asta A; Volpe N; Simone M; Di Pasquo E; Pignatelli D; Schera GBL; Di Paola M; Ricciardi P; Ferretti A; Frusca T; Casciaro S; Ghi T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 56(4):597-602. PubMed ID: 31909525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of intrapartal ultrasound to assess fetal head position and station on the type of obstetrical interventions at full cervical dilatation.
Dückelmann AM; Michaelis SA; Bamberg C; Dudenhausen JW; Kalache KD
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 May; 25(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 21726168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Role of 'angle of progression' in prediction of delivery mode.
Marsoosi V; Pirjani R; Mansouri B; Eslamian L; Jamal A; Heidari R; Rahimi-Foroushani A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1693-9. PubMed ID: 26370603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor.
Chou MR; Kreiser D; Taslimi MM; Druzin ML; El-Sayed YY
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Aug; 191(2):521-4. PubMed ID: 15343230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Relationship between fetal head station established using an open magnetic resonance imaging scanner and the angle of progression determined by transperineal ultrasound.
Bamberg C; Scheuermann S; Slowinski T; Dückelmann AM; Vogt M; Nguyen-Dobinsky TN; Streitparth F; Teichgräber U; Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Kalache KD
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):712-6. PubMed ID: 21308830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnosis of fetal occiput position using transperineal ultrasound.
Dimassi K; Temessek H; Ben Amor A; Triki A
Tunis Med; 2018 Jun; 96(6):360-365. PubMed ID: 30430474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of fetal head engagement with transperineal ultrasound: Searching for the cutoff level.
Desurmont S; Houzé de l'Aulnoit A; Brabant G; Houzé de l'Aulnoit D
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Sep; 47(7):317-324. PubMed ID: 29793035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of ultrasound determination of fetal head position on mode of delivery: a pragmatic randomized trial.
Popowski T; Porcher R; Fort J; Javoise S; Rozenberg P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 46(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 25583399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome.
Senécal J; Xiong X; Fraser WD;
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):763-72. PubMed ID: 15802403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of the angle of progression and distance perineum-head in the prediction of type of delivery and duration of labor using intrapartum ultrasonography.
Carvalho Neto RH; Viana Junior AB; Moron AF; Araujo Júnior E; Carvalho FHC; Feitosa HN
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Jul; 34(14):2340-2348. PubMed ID: 31505974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Determination of fetal head station and position during labor: a new technique that combines ultrasound and a position-tracking system.
Nizard J; Haberman S; Paltieli Y; Gonen R; Ohel G; Le Bourthe Y; Ville Y
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 200(4):404.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19217593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
