BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2335609)

  • 1. Gradient-echo MR imaging of the lumbar spine: comparison with spin-echo technique.
    Watanabe AT; Teitelbaum GP; Lufkin RB; Tsuruda JS; Jinkins JR; Bradley WG
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1990; 14(3):410-4. PubMed ID: 2335609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gradient echo imaging of the lumbar spine.
    Wasenko JJ; Rosenbaum AE; Yu SF; Falen SW; Collins CS
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1994; 18(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 7954312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Degenerative lumbar spine disorders in gradient refocused echo axial magnetic resonance images.
    Murayama S; Numaguchi Y; Robinson AE
    Clin Imaging; 1990 Aug; 14(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 2224620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between magnetization transfer contrast and fast spin-echo MR imaging of degenerative disease of the cervical spine at 0.3 T.
    Yoshioka H; Onaya H; Itai Y; Nishimura H; Matsumura A; Tsunoda T; Kandatsu S; Koga M; Yoshikawa K; Kato H; Tsujii H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 9084023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MRI of the lumbar spine: comparison of 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus conventional 2D sequences at 3.0 T.
    Lee S; Jee WH; Jung JY; Lee SY; Ryu KS; Ha KY
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Feb; 56(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24553584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of magnetization transfer for improved contrast on gradient-echo MR images of the cervical spine.
    Finelli DA; Hurst GC; Karaman BA; Simon JE; Duerk JL; Bellon EM
    Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):165-71. PubMed ID: 8090886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Volume fast spin-echo imaging of the cervical spine.
    Maldjian C; Adam RJ; Akhtar N; Bonakdarpour A; Boyko OB
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Feb; 6(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12680429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine: comparison of fat-suppressed and conventional T1-weighted images.
    Mirowitz SA; Shady KL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Aug; 159(2):385-9. PubMed ID: 1632362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast on T2-weighted images of the lumbar spine using fast spin-echo and gated conventional spin-echo sequences.
    Chappell PM; Glover GH; Enzmann DR
    Neuroradiology; 1995 Apr; 37(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 7603591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lumbar degenerative disk disease: prospective comparison of conventional T2-weighted spin-echo imaging and T2-weighted rapid acquisition relaxation-enhanced imaging.
    Ross JS; Ruggieri P; Tkach J; Obuchowski N; Dillinger J; Masaryk TJ; Modic MT
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1993; 14(5):1215-23. PubMed ID: 8237706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of T1 and T2 weighted images of the lumbar spine.
    Moffit B; Reicher M; Lufkin R; Bentson J
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1988; 12(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 3179982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital subtraction in contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine.
    Murray JG; Stack JP; Ennis JT; Behan M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):893-8. PubMed ID: 8141014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postoperative lumbar spine: contrast-enhanced chemical shift MR imaging.
    Bobman SA; Atlas SW; Listerud J; Grossman RI
    Radiology; 1991 May; 179(2):557-62. PubMed ID: 2014311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The diagnosis of herniated intervertebral disks with MR imaging: a comparison of gradient-refocused-echo and spin-echo pulse sequences.
    Murayama S; Numaguchi Y; Robinson AE
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1990; 11(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 2105601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Disc space-targeted angled axial MR images of the lumbar spine: a potential source of diagnostic error.
    Singh K; Helms CA; Fiorella D; Major NA
    Skeletal Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(12):1147-53. PubMed ID: 17912516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lumbar spine: postoperative MR imaging with Gd-DTPA.
    Hueftle MG; Modic MT; Ross JS; Masaryk TJ; Carter JR; Wilber RG; Bohlman HH; Steinberg PM; Delamarter RB
    Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):817-24. PubMed ID: 2966418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gradient-echo MR imaging of the cervical spine: evaluation of extradural disease.
    VanDyke C; Ross JS; Tkach J; Masaryk TJ; Modic MT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Aug; 153(2):393-8. PubMed ID: 2750626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calcification demonstrated as high signal intensity on T1-weighted MR images of the disks of the lumbar spine.
    Major NM; Helms CA; Genant HK
    Radiology; 1993 Nov; 189(2):494-6. PubMed ID: 8210379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Usefulness of slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) for reducing metallic artifacts in 3-T MRI.
    Lee YH; Lim D; Kim E; Kim S; Song HT; Suh JS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jun; 31(5):703-6. PubMed ID: 23290476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitation of structural distortion of the cervical neural foramina in gradient-echo MR imaging.
    Tien RD; Buxton RB; Schwaighofer BW; Chu PK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1991; 1(6):683-7. PubMed ID: 1823173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.