These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Comparison between magnetization transfer contrast and fast spin-echo MR imaging of degenerative disease of the cervical spine at 0.3 T. Yoshioka H; Onaya H; Itai Y; Nishimura H; Matsumura A; Tsunoda T; Kandatsu S; Koga M; Yoshikawa K; Kato H; Tsujii H Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 9084023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI of the lumbar spine: comparison of 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus conventional 2D sequences at 3.0 T. Lee S; Jee WH; Jung JY; Lee SY; Ryu KS; Ha KY Acta Radiol; 2015 Feb; 56(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24553584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of magnetization transfer for improved contrast on gradient-echo MR images of the cervical spine. Finelli DA; Hurst GC; Karaman BA; Simon JE; Duerk JL; Bellon EM Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):165-71. PubMed ID: 8090886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Volume fast spin-echo imaging of the cervical spine. Maldjian C; Adam RJ; Akhtar N; Bonakdarpour A; Boyko OB Acad Radiol; 1999 Feb; 6(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12680429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine: comparison of fat-suppressed and conventional T1-weighted images. Mirowitz SA; Shady KL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Aug; 159(2):385-9. PubMed ID: 1632362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast on T2-weighted images of the lumbar spine using fast spin-echo and gated conventional spin-echo sequences. Chappell PM; Glover GH; Enzmann DR Neuroradiology; 1995 Apr; 37(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 7603591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lumbar degenerative disk disease: prospective comparison of conventional T2-weighted spin-echo imaging and T2-weighted rapid acquisition relaxation-enhanced imaging. Ross JS; Ruggieri P; Tkach J; Obuchowski N; Dillinger J; Masaryk TJ; Modic MT AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1993; 14(5):1215-23. PubMed ID: 8237706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of T1 and T2 weighted images of the lumbar spine. Moffit B; Reicher M; Lufkin R; Bentson J Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1988; 12(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 3179982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital subtraction in contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine. Murray JG; Stack JP; Ennis JT; Behan M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):893-8. PubMed ID: 8141014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gradient-echo MR imaging of the cervical spine: evaluation of extradural disease. VanDyke C; Ross JS; Tkach J; Masaryk TJ; Modic MT AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Aug; 153(2):393-8. PubMed ID: 2750626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calcification demonstrated as high signal intensity on T1-weighted MR images of the disks of the lumbar spine. Major NM; Helms CA; Genant HK Radiology; 1993 Nov; 189(2):494-6. PubMed ID: 8210379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Usefulness of slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) for reducing metallic artifacts in 3-T MRI. Lee YH; Lim D; Kim E; Kim S; Song HT; Suh JS Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jun; 31(5):703-6. PubMed ID: 23290476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitation of structural distortion of the cervical neural foramina in gradient-echo MR imaging. Tien RD; Buxton RB; Schwaighofer BW; Chu PK J Magn Reson Imaging; 1991; 1(6):683-7. PubMed ID: 1823173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]