254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23356241)
1. When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.
Huff MJ; Bodner GE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23356241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Item-specific and relational processing both improve recall accuracy in the DRM paradigm.
Huff MJ; Bodner GE
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1493-1506. PubMed ID: 30188245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Item-specific processing reduces false recognition in older and younger adults: Separating encoding and retrieval using signal detection and the diffusion model.
Huff MJ; Aschenbrenner AJ
Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1287-1301. PubMed ID: 29959616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.
Burns DJ; Martens NJ; Bertoni AA; Sweeney EJ; Lividini MD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 16569146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Drawing individual images benefits recognition accuracy in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
Namias JM; Huff MJ; Smith A; Maxwell NP
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Aug; 75(8):1571-1582. PubMed ID: 34661459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Item-specific processing reduces false memories.
McCabe DP; Presmanes AG; Robertson CL; Smith AD
Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Dec; 11(6):1074-9. PubMed ID: 15875978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Associative relatedness enhances recall and produces false memories in immediate serial recall.
Tehan G
Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Dec; 64(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 21186910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reducing False Recognition in the Deese-Roediger/McDermott Paradigm: Related Lures Reveal How Distinctive Encoding Improves Encoding and Monitoring Processes.
Huff MJ; Bodner GE; Gretz MR
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():602347. PubMed ID: 33329270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mood and the DRM paradigm: An investigation of the effects of valence and arousal on false memory.
Van Damme I
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Jun; 66(6):1060-81. PubMed ID: 23057583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Why distinctive information reduces false memories: evidence for both impoverished relational-encoding and distinctiveness heuristic accounts.
Hege AC; Dodson CS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):787-95. PubMed ID: 15238023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. With sadness comes accuracy; with happiness, false memory: mood and the false memory effect.
Storbeck J; Clore GL
Psychol Sci; 2005 Oct; 16(10):785-91. PubMed ID: 16181441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. When true memory availability promotes false memory: evidence from confabulating patients.
Ciaramelli E; Ghetti S; Frattarelli M; Làdavas E
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1866-77. PubMed ID: 16580028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Both differences in encoding processes and monitoring at retrieval reduce false alarms when distinctive information is studied.
Hanczakowski M; Mazzoni G
Memory; 2011 Apr; 19(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 21500088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of increasing semantic-associate list length on the Deese-Roediger-McDermott false recognition memory: Dual false-memory process in retrieval from sub- and supraspan lists.
Jou J; Arredondo ML; Li C; Escamilla EE; Zuniga R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):2076-2093. PubMed ID: 27606720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Negative affect promotes encoding of and memory for details at the expense of the gist: affect, encoding, and false memories.
Storbeck J
Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(5):800-19. PubMed ID: 23134550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of distinctive processing manipulations on older adults' false memory.
Butler KM; McDaniel MA; McCabe DP; Dornburg CC
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2010 Mar; 17(2):129-59. PubMed ID: 19642045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What factors underlie associative and categorical memory illusions? The roles of backward associative strength and interitem connectivity.
Knott LM; Dewhurst SA; Howe ML
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):229-39. PubMed ID: 21875250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The strategic nature of false recognition in the DRM paradigm.
Miller MB; Guerin SA; Wolford GL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1228-35. PubMed ID: 21767060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Falsely recalled items are rich in item-specific information.
Burns DJ; Jenkins CL; Dean EE
Mem Cognit; 2007 Oct; 35(7):1630-40. PubMed ID: 18062541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Generation and mnemonic encoding induce a mirror effect in the DRM paradigm.
Guntre RW; Bodner GE; Azad T
Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 17910191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
