These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23356242)

  • 1. Relatively random: context effects on perceived randomness and predicted outcomes.
    Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1642-8. PubMed ID: 23356242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What's next? Judging sequences of binary events.
    Oskarsson AT; Van Boven L; McClelland GH; Hastie R
    Psychol Bull; 2009 Mar; 135(2):262-85. PubMed ID: 19254080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of randomness: On the time of streaks.
    Sun Y; Wang H
    Cogn Psychol; 2010 Dec; 61(4):333-42. PubMed ID: 20728080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting Outcomes in a Sequence of Binary Events: Belief Updating and Gambler's Fallacy Reasoning.
    Rao K; Hastie R
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Jan; 47(1):e13211. PubMed ID: 36680427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extending the two faces of subjective randomness: From the gambler's and hot-hand fallacies toward a hierarchy of binary sequence perception.
    Fischer I; Savranevski L
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Oct; 43(7):1056-70. PubMed ID: 26044942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are random events perceived as rare? On the relationship between perceived randomness and outcome probability.
    Teigen KH; Keren G
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):299-313. PubMed ID: 31900799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Who "believes" in the Gambler's Fallacy and why?
    Farmer GD; Warren PA; Hahn U
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jan; 146(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 28054813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why are people bad at detecting randomness? A statistical argument.
    Williams JJ; Griffiths TL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1473-90. PubMed ID: 23607677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How does sequence structure affect the judgment of time? Exploring a weighted sum of segments model.
    Matthews WJ
    Cogn Psychol; 2013 May; 66(3):259-82. PubMed ID: 23395774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural correlates of causality judgment in physical and social context--the reversed effects of space and time.
    Blos J; Chatterjee A; Kircher T; Straube B
    Neuroimage; 2012 Nov; 63(2):882-93. PubMed ID: 22828163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The hot hand belief and framing effects.
    MacMahon C; Köppen J; Raab M
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2014 Sep; 85(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 25141087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The hot hand fallacy and the gambler's fallacy: two faces of subjective randomness?
    Ayton P; Fischer I
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Dec; 32(8):1369-78. PubMed ID: 15900930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomness and inductions from streaks: "gambler's fallacy" versus "hot hand".
    Burns BD; Corpus B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Feb; 11(1):179-84. PubMed ID: 15117006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptions of randomness in binary sequences: Normative, heuristic, or both?
    Reimers S; Donkin C; Le Pelley ME
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():11-25. PubMed ID: 29202364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can we use verbal estimation to dissect the internal clock? Differentiating the effects of pacemaker rate, switch latencies, and judgment processes.
    Matthews WJ
    Behav Processes; 2011 Jan; 86(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 20933588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An effect of inter-trial duration on the gambler's fallacy choice bias.
    Militana E; Wolfson E; Cleaveland JM
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):455-9. PubMed ID: 20176090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptions of randomness: why three heads are better than four.
    Hahn U; Warren PA
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Apr; 116(2):454-61. PubMed ID: 19348550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On producing random binary sequences.
    Nickerson RS; Butler SF
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 19507422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adding small differences can increase similarity and choice.
    Kim J; Novemsky N; Dhar R
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Feb; 24(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 23257768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Judgments relative to patterns: how temporal sequence patterns affect judgments and memory.
    Kusev P; Ayton P; van Schaik P; Tsaneva-Atanasova K; Stewart N; Chater N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1874-86. PubMed ID: 21967269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.