These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23356390)

  • 1. Contemporaneous comparison of open vs minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.
    Pierorazio PM; Mullins JK; Eifler JB; Voth K; Hyams ES; Han M; Pavlovich CP; Bivalacqua TJ; Partin AW; Allaf ME; Schaeffer EM
    BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):751-7. PubMed ID: 23356390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience.
    Busch J; Stephan C; Herold A; Erber B; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Lein M; Weikert S; Miller K; Magheli A
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E985-90. PubMed ID: 22672442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes of pure versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon.
    Park B; Kim W; Jeong BC; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Choi HY; Seo SI
    Scand J Urol; 2013 Feb; 47(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 22835035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intermediate-term cancer control outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.
    Abdollah F; Dalela D; Sood A; Sammon J; Jeong W; Beyer B; Fossati N; Rogers CG; Diaz-Insua M; Peabody J; Haese A; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Briganti A; Menon M
    World J Urol; 2016 Oct; 34(10):1357-66. PubMed ID: 26873596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.
    Sivaraman A; Sanchez-Salas R; Prapotnich D; Yu K; Olivier F; Secin FP; Barret E; Galiano M; Rozet F; Cathelineau X
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e1-149.e6. PubMed ID: 28117215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is Radical Perineal Prostatectomy a Viable Therapeutic Option for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer?
    Lee HW; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Choi HY
    J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1631-7. PubMed ID: 26539008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prostate cancer biochemical recurrence rates after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Ginzburg S; Nevers T; Staff I; Tortora J; Champagne A; Kesler SS; Laudone VP; Wagner JR
    JSLS; 2012; 16(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 23318071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.
    Ilic D; Evans SM; Allan CA; Jung JH; Murphy D; Frydenberg M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Sep; 9(9):CD009625. PubMed ID: 28895658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival.
    Barocas DA; Salem S; Kordan Y; Herrell SD; Chang SS; Clark PE; Davis R; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Cookson MS; Smith JA
    J Urol; 2010 Mar; 183(3):990-6. PubMed ID: 20083261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching.
    Magheli A; Gonzalgo ML; Su LM; Guzzo TJ; Netto G; Humphreys EB; Han M; Partin AW; Pavlovich CP
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(12):1956-62. PubMed ID: 21044243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Propensity score comparison of the various radical surgical techniques for high-risk prostate cancer].
    Busch J; Gonzalgo M; Leva N; Ferrari M; Friedersdorff F; Hinz S; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Magheli A
    Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25526221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: comparative analysis of operative and pathologic outcomes for three techniques with a single surgeon's experience.
    Akand M; Celik O; Avci E; Duman I; Erdogru T
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2015 Feb; 19(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 25753865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Korean population: a 5-year propensity-score matched comparative analysis versus open radical prostatectomy.
    Koo KC; Tuliao P; Yoon YE; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Yang SC; Rha KH
    Int J Urol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):781-5. PubMed ID: 24661241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Colon-Herdman A; Heckman JE; Gomella LG; Lallas CD
    Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 22052763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Hruza M; Bermejo JL; Flinspach B; Schulze M; Teber D; Rumpelt HJ; Rassweiler JJ
    BJU Int; 2013 Feb; 111(2):271-80. PubMed ID: 22757970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implications of greater short-term PSA recurrence with laparoscopic as compared to retropubic radical prostatectomy for Japanese clinically localized prostate carcinomas.
    Akita H; Okamura T; Ando R; Nagata D; Naruyama H; Yamada Y; Naiki T; Yasui T; Tozawa K; Kohri K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(11):2959-61. PubMed ID: 22393971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A case-mix-adjusted comparison of early oncological outcomes of open and robotic prostatectomy performed by experienced high volume surgeons.
    Silberstein JL; Su D; Glickman L; Kent M; Keren-Paz G; Vickers AJ; Coleman JA; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Laudone VP
    BJU Int; 2013 Feb; 111(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 23356747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Matched comparison of outcomes following open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk patients.
    Busch J; Magheli A; Leva N; Hinz S; Ferrari M; Friedersdorff F; Fuller TF; Miller K; Gonzalgo ML
    World J Urol; 2014 Dec; 32(6):1411-6. PubMed ID: 24609219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.