These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23356632)

  • 1. Five-year multicenter study of magnetic attachments used for natural overdenture abutments.
    Gonda T; Yang TC; Maeda Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Apr; 40(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 23356632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical performance and satisfaction of removable prostheses with self-adjusting magnetic attachments.
    Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 24210730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strategic use of a new dental magnet system to retain partial and complete overdentures.
    Allen PF; Ulhuq A; Kearney J
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 16011237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scanning electron microscopy observations of failures of implant overdenture bars: a case series report.
    Waddell JN; Payne AG; Swain MV; Kieser JA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 20148915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of removable partial dentures on periodontal health of abutment and non-abutment teeth.
    Zlatarić DK; Celebić A; Valentić-Peruzović M
    J Periodontol; 2002 Feb; 73(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 11895277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ten-year follow-up study of conical crown-retained dentures.
    Igarashi Y; Goto T
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 9206455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcome of implant-supported overdenture treatment--a survey of 58 patients.
    Kuoppala R; Näpänkangas R; Raustia A
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e577-84. PubMed ID: 22616909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support.
    Cordaro L; Ercoli C; Rossini C; Torsello F; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 16198167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An overview of the O-ring implant overdenture attachment: clinical reports.
    Winkler S; Piermatti J; Rothman A; Siamos G
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 12498450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
    Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years.
    Kaufmann R; Friedli M; Hug S; Mericske-Stern R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):233-41; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 19548404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of attachment type and implant number on satisfaction and quality of life of mandibular implant-retained overdenture wearers.
    Mumcu E; Bilhan H; Geckili O
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e618-23. PubMed ID: 21726276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The maintenance requirements of mandibular overdentures stabilized by Astra Tech implants using three different attachment mechanisms--balls, magnets, and bars; 3-year results.
    Davis DM; Packer ME
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2000 Dec; 8(4):131-4. PubMed ID: 11692994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnet overdentures.
    Gillings BR
    Aust Prosthodont J; 1993; 7():13-21. PubMed ID: 8695187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
    Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
    De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.
    Ellis JS; Burawi G; Walls A; Thomason JM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses: a retrospective study of survival and complications.
    Schwindling FS; Dittmann B; Rammelsberg P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):488-93. PubMed ID: 24831747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical outcome of the altered cast impression procedure compared with use of a one-piece cast.
    Frank RP; Brudvik JS; Noonan CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):468-76. PubMed ID: 15153855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.