BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23356699)

  • 1. RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews.
    Wong G; Greenhalgh T; Westhorp G; Buckingham J; Pawson R
    J Adv Nurs; 2013 May; 69(5):987-1004. PubMed ID: 23356699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews.
    Wong G; Greenhalgh T; Westhorp G; Buckingham J; Pawson R
    BMC Med; 2013 Jan; 11():20. PubMed ID: 23360661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses.
    Wong G; Greenhalgh T; Westhorp G; Buckingham J; Pawson R
    J Adv Nurs; 2013 May; 69(5):1005-22. PubMed ID: 23356726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses.
    Wong G; Greenhalgh T; Westhorp G; Buckingham J; Pawson R
    BMC Med; 2013 Jan; 11():21. PubMed ID: 23360677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protocol--realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving standards (RAMESES).
    Greenhalgh T; Wong G; Westhorp G; Pawson R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Aug; 11():115. PubMed ID: 21843376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations.
    Wong G; Westhorp G; Manzano A; Greenhalgh J; Jagosh J; Greenhalgh T
    BMC Med; 2016 Jun; 14(1):96. PubMed ID: 27342217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Synthesising conceptual frameworks for patient and public involvement in research - a critical appraisal of a meta-narrative review.
    Evans D; Hopewell-Kelly N; Kok M; White J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):116. PubMed ID: 30359226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protocol--the RAMESES II study: developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation.
    Greenhalgh T; Wong G; Jagosh J; Greenhalgh J; Manzano A; Westhorp G; Pawson R
    BMJ Open; 2015 Aug; 5(8):e008567. PubMed ID: 26238395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. TRIPLE C reporting principles for case study evaluations of the role of context in complex interventions.
    Shaw SE; Paparini S; Murdoch J; Green J; Greenhalgh T; Hanckel B; James HM; Petticrew M; Wood GW; Papoutsi C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 May; 23(1):115. PubMed ID: 37179308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses.
    Siddaway AP; Wood AM; Hedges LV
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2019 Jan; 70():747-770. PubMed ID: 30089228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-narrative and realist reviews: guidance, rules, publication standards and quality appraisal.
    Gough D
    BMC Med; 2013 Jan; 11():22. PubMed ID: 23360691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving Peer Online Forums (iPOF): protocol for a realist evaluation of peer online mental health forums to inform practice and policy.
    Lobban F; Coole M; Donaldson E; Glossop Z; Haines J; Johnston R; Jones SH; Lodge C; Machin K; Marshall P; Meacock R; Penhaligon K; Rakić T; Rawsthorne M; Rayson P; Robinson H; Rycroft-Malone J; Semino E; Shryane N; Wise S
    BMJ Open; 2023 Jul; 13(7):e075142. PubMed ID: 37518092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interpretive analysis of 85 systematic reviews suggests that narrative syntheses and meta-analyses are incommensurate in argumentation.
    Melendez-Torres GJ; O'Mara-Eves A; Thomas J; Brunton G; Caird J; Petticrew M
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):109-118. PubMed ID: 27860329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
    Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.