BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23356699)

  • 21. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
    Ruano J; Gómez-García F; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Alcalde-Mellado P; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Viguera-Guerra I; Franco-García F; Cárdenas-Aranzana M; Romero JLH; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Isla-Tejera B; Garcia-Nieto AV
    Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Poor reporting of search strategy and conflict of interest in over 250 narrative and systematic reviews of two biologic agents in arthritis: a systematic review.
    Roundtree AK; Kallen MA; Lopez-Olivo MA; Kimmel B; Skidmore B; Ortiz Z; Cox V; Suarez-Almazor ME
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 62(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 19013763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An intervention to improve outcomes of falls in dementia: the DIFRID mixed-methods feasibility study.
    Allan LM; Wheatley A; Smith A; Flynn E; Homer T; Robalino S; Beyer FR; Fox C; Howel D; Barber R; Connolly JA; Robinson L; Parry SW; Rochester L; Corner L; Bamford C
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Oct; 23(59):1-208. PubMed ID: 31661058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Developing a program theory of patient engagement in patient-oriented research and the impacts on the health care system: protocol for a rapid realist review.
    Zibrowski E; McDonald S; Thiessen H; VanDusen R; Boden C; Carr T; Goodridge D; Haver C; Marciniuk D; Stobart C; Verrall T; Groot G
    CMAJ Open; 2020; 8(3):E530-E534. PubMed ID: 32873581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improving the quality of the evidence - The necessity to lead by example.
    Simons M; Busch K; Avolio A; Kiat H; Davidson A
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 46():165-166. PubMed ID: 28974392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biomedical and public health reviews and meta-analyses in Ethiopia had poor methodological quality: overview of evidence from 1970 to 2018.
    Habtewold TD; Alemu SM; Mohammed SH; Endalamaw A; Mohammed MA; Teferra AA; Tura AK; Asefa NG; Tegegne BS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 May; 109():90-98. PubMed ID: 30721723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the health sciences: Best practice methods for research syntheses.
    Johnson BT; Hennessy EA
    Soc Sci Med; 2019 Jul; 233():237-251. PubMed ID: 31233957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of narrative medicine on medical students' readiness for holistic care practice: a realist synthesis protocol.
    Huang Y; Monrouxe LV; Huang CD
    BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e029588. PubMed ID: 31377710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How does participatory research work: protocol for a realist synthesis.
    Belaid L; Sarmiento I; Dion A; Pimentel JP; Rojas-Cárdenas A; Cockcroft A; Andersson N
    BMJ Open; 2023 Sep; 13(9):e074075. PubMed ID: 37775285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.
    Liberati A; Altman DG; Tetzlaff J; Mulrow C; Gøtzsche PC; Ioannidis JP; Clarke M; Devereaux PJ; Kleijnen J; Moher D
    BMJ; 2009 Jul; 339():b2700. PubMed ID: 19622552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Environmental, health, wellbeing, social and equity effects of urban green space interventions: A meta-narrative evidence synthesis.
    Hunter RF; Cleland C; Cleary A; Droomers M; Wheeler BW; Sinnett D; Nieuwenhuijsen MJ; Braubach M
    Environ Int; 2019 Sep; 130():104923. PubMed ID: 31228780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
    Peters MDJ; Marnie C; Tricco AC; Pollock D; Munn Z; Alexander L; McInerney P; Godfrey CM; Khalil H
    JBI Evid Synth; 2020 Oct; 18(10):2119-2126. PubMed ID: 33038124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review.
    Greenhalgh T; Robert G; Macfarlane F; Bate P; Kyriakidou O; Peacock R
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Jul; 61(2):417-30. PubMed ID: 15893056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Protocol for a meta-narrative review on research paradigms addressing the urban built environment and human health.
    Kim J; Harris-Roxas B; de Leeuw E; Lilley D; Crimeen A; Sainsbury P
    Syst Rev; 2021 Dec; 10(1):311. PubMed ID: 34895329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
    Liberati A; Altman DG; Tetzlaff J; Mulrow C; Gøtzsche PC; Ioannidis JP; Clarke M; Devereaux PJ; Kleijnen J; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):e1-34. PubMed ID: 19631507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
    Liberati A; Altman DG; Tetzlaff J; Mulrow C; Gøtzsche PC; Ioannidis JP; Clarke M; Devereaux PJ; Kleijnen J; Moher D
    Ann Intern Med; 2009 Aug; 151(4):W65-94. PubMed ID: 19622512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
    Peters MDJ; Marnie C; Tricco AC; Pollock D; Munn Z; Alexander L; McInerney P; Godfrey CM; Khalil H
    JBI Evid Implement; 2021 Mar; 19(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 33570328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.