BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

460 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23357016)

  • 21. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae subspecies boulardii CNCM I-1079 on feed intake by healthy beef cattle treated with florfenicol and on health and performance of newly received beef heifers.
    Keyser SA; McMeniman JP; Smith DR; MacDonald JC; Galyean ML
    J Anim Sci; 2007 May; 85(5):1264-73. PubMed ID: 17264239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of residual feed intake and dam body weight on replacement heifer intake, efficiency, performance, and metabolic response.
    Walker RS; Martin RM; Buttrey B
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3602-12. PubMed ID: 26440028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of limit feeding high- and low-concentrate diets with Saccharomyces cerevisiae on digestibility and on dairy heifer growth and first-lactation performance.
    Lascano GJ; Zanton GI; Suarez-Mena FX; Heinrichs AJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5100-10. PubMed ID: 19762828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Flooring in front of the feed bunk affects feeding behavior and use of freestalls by dairy cows.
    Tucker CB; Weary DM; de Passillé AM; Campbell B; Rushen J
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Jun; 89(6):2065-71. PubMed ID: 16702270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Are there benefits in introducing dairy heifers to the main dairy herd in the evening rather than the morning?
    Boyle AR; Ferris CP; O'Connell NE
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):3650-61. PubMed ID: 22720923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Grazed grass herbage intake and performance of beef heifers with predetermined phenotypic residual feed intake classification.
    Lawrence P; Kenny DA; Earley B; McGee M
    Animal; 2012 Oct; 6(10):1648-61. PubMed ID: 23031564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relationship between feeding behavior and performance of feedlot steers fed barley-based diets.
    Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS; Hickman DD; Shah MA; Krehbiel CR; Genswein BM; Silasi R; Gibb DG; Crews DH; McAllister TA
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Apr; 89(4):1180-92. PubMed ID: 21415425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of frequency of feed delivery on the behavior and productivity of lactating dairy cows.
    Hart KD; McBride BW; Duffield TF; DeVries TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1713-24. PubMed ID: 24418268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relationship between feeding behavior and residual feed intake in growing Brangus heifers.
    Bingham GM; Friend TH; Lancaster PA; Carstens GE
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Aug; 87(8):2685-9. PubMed ID: 19395511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of timing and duration of test period and diet type on intake and feed efficiency of Charolais-sired cattle.
    Cassady CJ; Felix TL; Beever JE; Shike DW
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Nov; 94(11):4748-4758. PubMed ID: 27898945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of early exposure to mixed rations differing in forage particle size on feed sorting of dairy calves.
    Miller-Cushon EK; Montoro C; Bach A; DeVries TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 May; 96(5):3257-64. PubMed ID: 23522673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of feeding frequency of a total mixed ration on the performance of high-yielding dairy cows.
    Mäntysaari P; Khalili H; Sariola J
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Nov; 89(11):4312-20. PubMed ID: 17033019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of straw processing and pen overstocking on the growth performance and sorting characteristics of diets offered to replacement Holstein dairy heifers.
    Coblentz WK; Akins MS; Esser NM; Ogden RK; Gelsinger SL
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Feb; 101(2):1074-1087. PubMed ID: 29224869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Moderate decreases in the forage-to-concentrate ratio before feed restriction and increases thereafter independently improve the recovery from a feed restriction insult in beef cattle.
    Albornoz RI; Aschenbach JR; Barreda DR; Penner GB
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4739-49. PubMed ID: 23942712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of feeding frequency on intake, ruminal fermentation, and feeding behavior in heifers fed high-concentrate diets.
    Robles V; González LA; Ferret A; Manteca X; Calsamiglia S
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2538-47. PubMed ID: 17609471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Intake, water consumption, ruminal fermentation, and stress response of beef heifers fed after different lengths of delays in the daily feed delivery time.
    González LA; Correa LB; Ferret A; Manteca X; Ruíz-de-la-Torre JL; Calsamiglia S
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Aug; 87(8):2709-18. PubMed ID: 19359507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of restricted feed intake on finishing pigs weighing between 68 and 114 kilograms fed twice or 6 times daily.
    Schneider JD; Tokach MD; Goodband RD; Nelssen JL; Dritz SS; Derouchey JM; Sulabo RC
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Oct; 89(10):3326-33. PubMed ID: 21934028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Short communication: Relationship between competitive success during displacements at an overstocked feed bunk and measures of physiology and behavior in Holstein dairy cattle.
    Huzzey JM; Grant RJ; Overton TR
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4434-41. PubMed ID: 22818456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relationships between postweaning residual feed intake in heifers and forage use, body composition, feeding behavior, physical activity, and heart rate of pregnant beef females.
    Hafla AN; Carstens GE; Forbes TD; Tedeschi LO; Bailey JC; Walter JT; Johnson JR
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Nov; 91(11):5353-65. PubMed ID: 23989881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of the number of concentrate feeding places per pen on performance, behavior, and welfare indicators of Friesian calves during the first month after arrival at the feedlot.
    González LA; Ferret A; Manteca X; Ruíz-de-la-Torre JL; Calsamiglia S; Devant M; Bach A
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Feb; 86(2):419-31. PubMed ID: 17940151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.