These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23357092)

  • 1. Rhythm implicitly affects temporal orienting of attention across modalities.
    Bolger D; Trost W; Schön D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Feb; 142(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 23357092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal predictions provided by musical rhythm influence visual memory encoding.
    Johndro H; Jacobs L; Patel AD; Race E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Sep; 200():102923. PubMed ID: 31759191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metrical rhythm implicitly orients attention in time as indexed by improved target detection and left inferior parietal activation.
    Bolger D; Coull JT; Schön D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):593-605. PubMed ID: 24168222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Musical rhythm effects on visual attention are non-rhythmical: evidence against metrical entrainment.
    Schirmer A; Wijaya M; Chiu MH; Maess B; Gunter TC
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2021 Jan; 16(1-2):58-71. PubMed ID: 32507877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1186():224-32. PubMed ID: 18005944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audiovisual beat induction in complex auditory rhythms: point-light figure movement as an effective visual beat.
    Su YH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():40-50. PubMed ID: 24932996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-modal interactions in auditory and visual discrimination.
    Marks LE; Ben-Artzi E; Lakatos S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2003 Oct; 50(1-2):125-45. PubMed ID: 14511841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception in action: the impact of sensory information on sensorimotor synchronization in musicians and non-musicians.
    Krause V; Pollok B; Schnitzler A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jan; 133(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 19751937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The anterior N1 component as an index of modality shifting.
    Töllner T; Gramann K; Müller HJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1653-69. PubMed ID: 18767917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of metricality and modality on synchronization with a beat.
    Patel AD; Iversen JR; Chen Y; Repp BH
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 May; 163(2):226-38. PubMed ID: 15654589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-modal deactivations during modality-specific selective attention.
    Mozolic JL; Joyner D; Hugenschmidt CE; Peiffer AM; Kraft RA; Maldjian JA; Laurienti PJ
    BMC Neurol; 2008 Sep; 8():35. PubMed ID: 18817554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Independent effects of temporal expectation and stimulus intensity in audition.
    Schnuerch R; Kreitz C; Lange K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1520-32. PubMed ID: 23757047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When audition dominates vision: evidence from cross-modal statistical learning.
    Robinson CW; Sloutsky VM
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 23047918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1075-81. PubMed ID: 20565224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: an event-related potential study.
    Beer AL; Röder B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15787717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Region-specific modulations in oscillatory alpha activity serve to facilitate processing in the visual and auditory modalities.
    Mazaheri A; van Schouwenburg MR; Dimitrijevic A; Denys D; Cools R; Jensen O
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():356-62. PubMed ID: 24188814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.