These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23357283)

  • 1. A quantitative analysis of the effects of qualitatively different reinforcers on fixed ratio responding in inbred strains of mice.
    Hutsell BA; Newland MC
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2013 Mar; 101():85-93. PubMed ID: 23357283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of reinforcer quality and step size on rats' performance under progressive ratio schedules.
    Covarrubias P; Aparicio CF
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 18346855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the inbred C57BL/6 and outbred CD1 mouse strains using a progressive ratio schedule during development.
    Campos-Ordoñez T; Buriticá J
    Physiol Behav; 2024 Apr; 277():114485. PubMed ID: 38336087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing reproducibility of operant testing through reinforcer standardization: identification of key nutritional constituents determining reward strength in touchscreens.
    Kim EW; Phillips BU; Heath CJ; Cho SY; Kim H; Sreedharan J; Song HT; Lee JE; Bussey TJ; Kim CH; Kim E; Saksida LM
    Mol Brain; 2017 Jul; 10(1):31. PubMed ID: 28716096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cocaine self-administration under fixed and progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement: comparison of C57BL/6J, 129X1/SvJ, and 129S6/SvEvTac inbred mice.
    Thomsen M; Caine SB
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Jan; 184(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 16369835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of reinforcer magnitude on performance maintained by progressive-ratio schedules.
    Rickard JF; Body S; Zhang Z; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Jan; 91(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 19230513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reinforcer quality matters: A test of the Mathematical Principles of Reinforcement with domestic hens (Gallus gallus domesticus).
    Bruce JM; Jackson SMK; Bizo LA; McEwan JAS; Foster TM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jul; 112(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 31250443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The contribution of endogenous opioids to food reward is dependent on sex and background strain.
    Hayward MD; Low MJ
    Neuroscience; 2007 Jan; 144(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17049174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of cocaine on operant responding for food in several strains of mice.
    Heyser CJ; McDonald JS; Beauchamp V; Koob GF; Gold LH
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1997 Jul; 132(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 9266618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of reinforcer magnitude in the preceding and upcoming ratios on between-ratio pausing in multiple, mixed, and single fixed-ratio schedules.
    Young R; Foster TM; Bizo LA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Nov; 108(3):414-432. PubMed ID: 29139112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Control of response duration by delayed reinforcers: A systematic replication.
    Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2019 Oct; 167():103920. PubMed ID: 31374227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fixed-ratio schedules of oral ethanol self-administration in inbred mouse strains.
    Elmer GI; Meisch RA; Goldberg SR; George FR
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1988; 96(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 3149762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative analysis of the effects of some "atypical" and "conventional" antipsychotics on progressive ratio schedule performance.
    Zhang Z; Rickard JF; Asgari K; Body S; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2005 May; 179(2):489-97. PubMed ID: 15565430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimisation of cognitive performance in rodent operant (touchscreen) testing: Evaluation and effects of reinforcer strength.
    Phillips BU; Heath CJ; Ossowska Z; Bussey TJ; Saksida LM
    Learn Behav; 2017 Sep; 45(3):252-262. PubMed ID: 28205186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Operant discrimination learning and operant bar-pressing rates in inbred and heterogeneous laboratory mice.
    Padeh B; Wahlsten D; DeFries JC
    Behav Genet; 1974 Dec; 4(4):383-93. PubMed ID: 4433313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reinforcer magnitude and demand under fixed-ratio schedules with domestic hens.
    Grant AA; Foster TM; Temple W; Jackson S; Kinloch J; Poling A
    Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():199-210. PubMed ID: 24393654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A theory of behaviour on progressive ratio schedules, with applications in behavioural pharmacology.
    Bradshaw CM; Killeen PR
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2012 Aug; 222(4):549-64. PubMed ID: 22752382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Second-order stimuli do not always increase overall response rates in second-order schedules of reinforcement in the rat.
    Wilson DI; Bowman EM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Jul; 174(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 15083254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Demand equations for qualitatively different foods under fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of three data conversions.
    Foster TM; Sumpter CE; Temple W; Flevill A; Poling A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Nov; 92(3):305-26. PubMed ID: 20514164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of differing response-force requirements on food-maintained responding in C57Bl/6J mice.
    Zarcone TJ; Chen R; Fowler SC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Sep; 92(2):257-74. PubMed ID: 20354603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.