These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2335772)

  • 21. Matching to complex stimuli under non-reinforced conditions: errorless transfer from identity to arbitrary matching tasks.
    Smeets PM; Striefel S
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1994 Feb; 47(1):39-62. PubMed ID: 8165325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pigeons' spatial memory: factors affecting delayed matching of key location.
    Wilkie DM; Summers RJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Jan; 37(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 7057128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Learning processes in matching and oddity: the oddity preference effect and sample reinforcement.
    Wright AA; Delius JD
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 16248729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of training delays and start and stop markers on the choose-short effect in pigeons.
    Talarico DC; Grant DS
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):98-106. PubMed ID: 16095850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Differential vocalization in budgerigars: towards an experimental analysis of naming.
    Manabe K; Kawashima T; Staddon JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Jan; 63(1):111-26. PubMed ID: 7869022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of stimulus manipulations on visual categorization in pigeons.
    Lazareva OF; Freiburger KL; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):224-33. PubMed ID: 16616817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Expectancy mediation of concurrent conditional discriminations.
    Peterson GB; Trapold MA
    Am J Psychol; 1982; 95(4):571-80. PubMed ID: 7168456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An analysis of emergent simple discrimination in children.
    Boelens H; Smeets P
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1990 May; 42(2):135-52. PubMed ID: 2367687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight duration samples in pigeons.
    Grant DS
    Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 16481126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Emergent conditional discrimination in children: matching to compound stimuli.
    Schenk JJ
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1993 Nov; 46(4):345-65. PubMed ID: 8272525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Scratch and match: pigeons learn matching and oddity with gravel stimuli.
    Wright AA; Delius JD
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1994 Jan; 20(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 8308488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Control of matching by differential outcome expectancies in the absence of differential sample-outcome associations: a serial compound view.
    Demarse TB; Urcuioli PJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):449-66. PubMed ID: 16248731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons.
    Lazareva OF; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 16460886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Matching-to-sample accuracy on fixed-ratio schedules.
    Thomas JR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Sep; 32(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 501271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analysis of the unique cue in configural discriminations.
    Rescorla RA; Grau JW; Durlach PJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1985 Jul; 11(3):356-66. PubMed ID: 4009124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of perceptual training on the salience of information in a recall problem.
    West RL; Odom RD
    Child Dev; 1979 Dec; 50(4):1261-4. PubMed ID: 535443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Control of pigeons' matching-to-sample performance by differential sample response requirements.
    Hogan DE; Zentall TR; Pace G
    Am J Psychol; 1983; 96(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 6859346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automatization and training in visual search.
    Czerwinski M; Lightfoot N; Shiffrin RM
    Am J Psychol; 1992; 105(2):271-315. PubMed ID: 1621883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pigeons see correspondence between objects and their pictures.
    Spetch ML; Friedman A
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Nov; 17(11):966-72. PubMed ID: 17176429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Matching-to-sample by an echolocating dolphin (Tursiops truncatus).
    Roitblat HL; Penner RH; Nachtigall PE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 2303796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.