707 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23357804)
21. Benefits of Nonlinear Frequency Compression in Adult Hearing Aid Users.
Kokx-Ryan M; Cohen J; Cord MT; Walden TC; Makashay MJ; Sheffield BM; Brungart DS
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):838-55. PubMed ID: 26554489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.
Cullington HE; Zeng FG
Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 21178567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparing Two Hearing Aid Fitting Algorithms for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
Vroegop JL; Homans NC; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 29782445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of hearing aid bandwidth on speech recognition performance of listeners using a cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid (bimodal hearing).
Neuman AC; Svirsky MA
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):553-61. PubMed ID: 23632973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Amount of Frequency Compression in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users Is a Poor Predictor for Audibility and Spatial Hearing.
Sharma S; Nogueira W; van Opstal AJ; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; van Wanrooij MM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 64(12):5000-5013. PubMed ID: 34714704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Factors Affecting Bimodal Benefit in Pediatric Mandarin-Speaking Chinese Cochlear Implant Users.
Liu YW; Tao DD; Chen B; Cheng X; Shu Y; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1316-1327. PubMed ID: 30882534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Should a hearing aid in the contralateral ear be recommended for children with a unilateral cochlear implant?
Beijen JW; Mylanus EA; Leeuw AR; Snik AF
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2008 Jun; 117(6):397-403. PubMed ID: 18646435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. From hearing with a cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid (CI/HA) to hearing with two cochlear implants (CI/CI): a within-subject design comparison.
Luntz M; Egra-Dagan D; Attias J; Yehudai N; Most T; Shpak T
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):1682-90. PubMed ID: 25275862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The role of a new contralateral routing of signal microphone in established unilateral cochlear implant recipients.
Grewal AS; Kuthubutheen J; Smilsky K; Nedzelski JM; Chen JM; Friesen L; Lin VY
Laryngoscope; 2015 Jan; 125(1):197-202. PubMed ID: 25224587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Asymmetric Hearing Loss in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients: Results and Recommendations From a Multisite Prospective Clinical Trial.
Firszt JB; Holden LK; Dwyer NY; Reeder RM; Strube MJ;
Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1140-1156. PubMed ID: 37018114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Benefits of localization and speech perception with multiple noise sources in listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant.
Dunn CC; Perreau A; Gantz B; Tyler RS
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 20085199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness.
Niparko JK; Cox KM; Lustig LR
Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 12544032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Benefit of contralateral hearing aid in adult cochlear implant bearers.
Bouccara D; Blanchet E; Waterlot PE; Smadja M; Frachet B; Meyer B; Sterkers O
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2016 Jun; 133(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 26679231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on speech identification in children with hearing loss.
Hillock-Dunn A; Buss E; Duncan N; Roush PA; Leibold LJ
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 24496288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Spatial hearing and speech intelligibility in bilateral cochlear implant users.
Litovsky RY; Parkinson A; Arcaroli J
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):419-31. PubMed ID: 19455039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of unilateral input and mode of hearing in the better ear: self-reported performance using the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale.
Dwyer NY; Firszt JB; Reeder RM
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 24084062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Benefits of Bimodal Stimulation.
van Loon MC; Smits C; Smit CF; Hensen EF; Merkus P
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jul; 38(6):e100-e106. PubMed ID: 28441230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
