These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23358048)

  • 1. The chicken foot dorsal vessel as a high-fidelity microsurgery practice model.
    Satterwhite T; Son J; Echo A; Lee G
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Feb; 131(2):311e-312e. PubMed ID: 23358048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel supermicrosurgery training model: the chicken thigh.
    Chen WF; Eid A; Yamamoto T; Keith J; Nimmons GL; Lawrence WT
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Jul; 67(7):973-8. PubMed ID: 24742690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microsurgical training: the chicken thigh model.
    Marsh DJ; Norton SE; Mok J; Patel HD; Chen HC
    Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Sep; 59(3):355-6. PubMed ID: 17721235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microsurgical training regimen with nonliving chicken models.
    Couceiro J; Ozyurekoglu T; Sanders S; Tien H
    Microsurgery; 2013 Mar; 33(3):251-2. PubMed ID: 23180550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The usefulness of a fresh chicken leg as an experimental model during the intermediate stages of microsurgical training.
    Galeano M; Zarabini AG
    Ann Plast Surg; 2001 Jul; 47(1):96-7. PubMed ID: 11756816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microsurgical training with fresh chicken legs.
    Jeong HS; Moon MS; Kim HS; Lee HK; Yi SY
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jan; 70(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 22156886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental model for learning in vascular surgery and microsurgery: esophagus and trachea of chicken.
    Achar RA; Lozano PA; Achar BN; Pereira Filho GV; Achar E
    Acta Cir Bras; 2011 Apr; 26(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 21445471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative use of turkey and chicken wing brachial artery models for microvascular anastomosis training.
    Abla AA; Uschold T; Preul MC; Zabramski JM
    J Neurosurg; 2011 Dec; 115(6):1231-5. PubMed ID: 21962125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A supermicrosurgery pig foot training model for practice of lymphaticovenular anastomosis.
    Banda CH; Mitsui K; Ishiura R; Danno K; Narushima M
    Microsurgery; 2020 Jan; 40(1):91-92. PubMed ID: 31625619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Step by step: microsurgical training method combining two nonliving animal models.
    Couceiro J; Castro R; Tien H; Ozyurekoglu T
    J Vis Exp; 2015 May; (99):e52625. PubMed ID: 25992633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A supermicrosurgery training model using the chicken mid and lower wing.
    Hayashi K; Hattori Y; Yii Chia DS; Sakamoto S; Marei A; Doi K
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Jun; 71(6):943-945. PubMed ID: 29545127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Novel Ex Vivo Training Model for Acquiring Supermicrosurgical Skills Using a Chicken Leg.
    Cifuentes IJ; Rodriguez JR; Yañez RA; Salisbury MC; Cuadra ÁJ; Varas JE; Dagnino BL
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2016 Nov; 32(9):699-705. PubMed ID: 27542106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fowl surgery at sea. Proving a microvascular capability in PCRF.
    Smith JJ; Scerri GV; Rickard RF
    J R Nav Med Serv; 2008; 94(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 18524135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of microsurgical models in microsurgery training and competence: a review.
    Chan WY; Matteucci P; Southern SJ
    Microsurgery; 2007; 27(5):494-9. PubMed ID: 17596849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microvascular anastomotic coupler application learning curve: A curriculum supporting further deliberate practice in ex-vivo simulation models.
    Pafitanis G; Cooper L; Hadjiandreou M; Ghanem A; Myers S
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Feb; 72(2):203-210. PubMed ID: 30501971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Stanford Microsurgery and Resident Training (SMaRT) Scale: validation of an on-line global rating scale for technical assessment.
    Satterwhite T; Son J; Carey J; Echo A; Spurling T; Paro J; Gurtner G; Chang J; Lee GK
    Ann Plast Surg; 2014 May; 72 Suppl 1():S84-8. PubMed ID: 24691332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of earthworms for microsurgery training.
    Mantovani G; Fukushima WY; Baik Cho A; Aita MA; Mazzetti MV
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2009 May; 25(4):275-8. PubMed ID: 19085816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Rational use of animal models for research and microsurgery training].
    Kinshoku MR; Rodriguez CA; Fidalgo Rde S; Duran CC; Leme PL; Duarte Ida S
    Rev Col Bras Cir; 2012; 39(5):414-7. PubMed ID: 23174794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding Z plasties - deepening of webspace on chicken foot model.
    Loh CY; Athanassopoulos T
    Hand Surg; 2014; 19(2):323-4. PubMed ID: 24875526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Flower Petal Training System in Microsurgery: Validation of a Training Model Using a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Volovici V; Dammers R; Lawton MT; Dirven CMF; Ketelaar T; Lanzino G; Zamfirescu DG
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Dec; 83(6):697-701. PubMed ID: 31232823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.