113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23358334)
1. [Evaluation and examination of accuracy for the conversion factors of effective dose per dose-length product].
Kobayashi M; Ootsuka T; Suzuki S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Jan; 69(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 23358334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning.
Christner JA; Kofler JM; McCollough CH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 20308486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Organ and effective dose evaluation in coronary angiography by using a 320 MDCT based on in-phantom dose measurements with TLDs.
Lu H; Zhuo W; Xu B; Wang M
J Radiol Prot; 2015 Sep; 35(3):597-609. PubMed ID: 26180015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental examination of radiation doses from cardiac and liver CT perfusion in a phantom study as a function of organ, age and sex.
Bos D; König B; Blex S; Zensen S; Opitz M; Maier S; Forsting M; Zylka W; Kühl H; Wetter A; Guberina N
J Radiol Prot; 2021 Aug; 41(3):. PubMed ID: 34406127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner.
Einstein AJ; Elliston CD; Arai AE; Chen MY; Mather R; Pearson GD; Delapaz RL; Nickoloff E; Dutta A; Brenner DJ
Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):698-706. PubMed ID: 20177085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique.
Sommer WH; Schenzle JC; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Graser A; Michalski G; Neumaier K; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 20027121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product.
Deak PD; Smal Y; Kalender WA
Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):158-66. PubMed ID: 20851940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose?
Schenzle JC; Sommer WH; Neumaier K; Michalski G; Lechel U; Nikolaou K; Becker CR; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):347-53. PubMed ID: 20404737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction?
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Oikonomou I; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):654-62. PubMed ID: 21673583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation doses with various body weights of phantoms in brain 128-slice MDCT examination.
Lin HC; Lai TJ; Tseng HC; Wang CH; Tseng YL; Chen CY
J Radiat Res; 2019 Jul; 60(4):466-475. PubMed ID: 31197311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation exposure to patients in a multicenter coronary angiography trial (CORE 64).
Geleijns J; Joemai RM; Dewey M; de Roos A; Zankl M; Cantera AC; Artells MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):1126-32. PubMed ID: 21512080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lung Cancer Screening CT: Sex-Specific Conversion Factors to Estimate Effective Radiation Dose From Dose-Length Product.
Cohen SL; Wang JJ; Chan N; O'Connell W; Shah R; Sanelli P; Raoof S
Chest; 2019 Dec; 156(6):1214-1222. PubMed ID: 31421112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Estimation of effective dose from CT examination].
Nishizawa K; Maruyama T; Takayama M; Iwai K; Furuya Y
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Sep; 55(11):763-8. PubMed ID: 8532509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methods of CT Dose Estimation in Whole-Body ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT.
Inoue Y; Nagahara K; Tanaka Y; Miyatake H; Hata H; Hara T
J Nucl Med; 2015 May; 56(5):695-700. PubMed ID: 25840979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation exposure in perfusion CT of the brain.
Ringelstein A; Lechel U; Fahrendorf DM; Altenbernd JC; Forsting M; Schlamann M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 24378887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient radiation dose at CT urography and conventional urography.
Nawfel RD; Judy PF; Schleipman AR; Silverman SG
Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 15220498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomography.
Geleijns J; Van Unnik JG; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Broerse JJ
Br J Radiol; 1994 Apr; 67(796):360-5. PubMed ID: 8173877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Verification of organ doses calculated by a dose monitoring software tool based on Monte Carlo Simulation in thoracic CT protocols.
Guberina N; Suntharalingam S; Naßenstein K; Forsting M; Theysohn J; Wetter A; Ringelstein A
Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):322-326. PubMed ID: 28618854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT effective dose per dose length product using ICRP 103 weighting factors.
Huda W; Magill D; He W
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1261-5. PubMed ID: 21520838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PHANTOM EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON PATIENT DOSES OBTAINED FROM 320-MULTIDETECTOR-ROW COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN WHOLE-BRAIN PERFUSION SCAN.
Lu H; Meng T; You Y; Liu Y; He K; Kan Y; Zhang H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2022 Oct; 198(18):1424-1434. PubMed ID: 36125221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
