267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23358597)
21. Environmental measurements in an emergency: this is not a drill.
Musolino SV; Clark H; McCullough T; Pemberton W
Health Phys; 2012 May; 102(5):516-26. PubMed ID: 22469930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Environmental contamination and external radiation dose rates from radionuclides released from the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant.
Taira Y; Hayashida N; Yamashita S; Kudo T; Matsuda N; Takahashi J; Gutevitc A; Kazlovsky A; Takamura N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Sep; 151(3):537-45. PubMed ID: 22504310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Comparative analysis of the radionuclide composition in fallout after the Chernobyl and the Fukushima accidents].
Kotenko KV; Shinkarev SM; Abramov IuV; Granovskaia EO; Iatsenko VN; Gavrilin IuI; Margulis UIa; Garetskaia OS; Imanaka T; Khoshi M
Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2012; (10):1-5. PubMed ID: 23210176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers.
Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF
Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Spanish experience on modeling of environmental radioactive contamination due to Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident using JRODOS.
Dvorzhak A; Puras C; Montero M; Mora JC
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Nov; 46(21):11887-95. PubMed ID: 23067255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Radiological effluents released by U.S. commercial nuclear power plants from 1995-2005.
Harris JT; Miller DW
Health Phys; 2008 Dec; 95(6):734-43. PubMed ID: 19001900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Insights into potential consequences of fusion hypothetical accident, lessons learnt from the former fission accidents.
Nie B; Ni M; Liu J; Zhu Z; Zhu Z; Li F
Environ Pollut; 2019 Feb; 245():921-931. PubMed ID: 30513506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Tools for placing the radiological health hazard in perspective following a severe emergency at a light water reactor (LWR) or its spent fuel pool.
McKenna T; Welter PV; Callen J; Martincic R; Dodd B; Kutkov V
Health Phys; 2015 Jan; 108(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 25437516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Global nuclear industry views: challenges arising from the evolution of the optimisation principle in radiological protection.
Saint-Pierre S
Ann ICRP; 2012; 41(3-4):275-81. PubMed ID: 23089026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Epidemiological studies of Fukushima residents exposed to ionising radiation from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant prefecture--a preliminary review of current plans.
Akiba S
J Radiol Prot; 2012 Mar; 32(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 22327057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Actual measurements following the Chernobyl reactor accident].
Irlweck K
Acta Med Austriaca; 1986; 13(4-5):107-13. PubMed ID: 3577635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. ASSESSMENT OF RADIOLOGICAL DOSES FOR PEOPLE LIVING IN KOREA FOLLOWING ACCIDENTAL RELEASES OF RADIONUCLIDES FROM NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN KOREA AND CHINA.
Kim S; Park K; Min BI; Yang BM; Kim J; Suh KS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jul; 184(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 30371891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Radiological risk evaluation applied to aerial evacuation procedures in a nuclear scenario.
Alves DF; Stenders RM; Federico CA; Andrade ER
J Radiol Prot; 2022 Sep; 42(3):. PubMed ID: 36130586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Uncertainties in short term prediction of atmospheric dispersion of radionuclides. A case study of a hypothetical accident in a nuclear floating power plant off the West coast of Norway.
Berge E; Andronopoulos S; Klein H; Lind OC; Salbu B; Syed N; Ulimoen M
J Environ Radioact; 2021 Jul; 233():106587. PubMed ID: 33773365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Investigation: revelations about Three Mile Island disaster raise doubts over nuclear plant safety: a special facing south investigation by Sue Sturgis.
Sturgis S
New Solut; 2009; 19(4):481-92. PubMed ID: 20129905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Changes of radionuclides in the environment in Chiba, Japan, after the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident.
Nagaoka K; Sato S; Araki S; Ohta Y; Ikeuchi Y
Health Phys; 2012 Apr; 102(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 22378205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Questionnaire- and measurement-based individual thyroid doses in Ukraine resulting from the Chornobyl nuclear reactor accident.
Likhtarev I; Bouville A; Kovgan L; Luckyanov N; Voillequé P; Chepurny M
Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):271-86. PubMed ID: 16808613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Increased occupational radiation doses: nuclear fuel cycle.
Bouville A; Kryuchkov V
Health Phys; 2014 Feb; 106(2):259-71. PubMed ID: 24378501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of radiological consequence of a hypothetical accident at the Ghana Research Reactor-1 facility based on terrorist attack.
Obeng HK; Birikorang SA; Gyamfi K; Adu S; Nyamful A
Sci Prog; 2021 Oct; 104(4):368504211054986. PubMed ID: 34821181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dutch distribution zones of stable iodine tablets based on atmospheric dispersion modelling of accidental releases from nuclear power plants.
Kok-Palma Y; Leenders M; Meulenbelt J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Aug; 140(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 20332130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
