BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23358959)

  • 1. Comparison of contamination of femoral heads and pre-processed bone chips during hip revision arthroplasty.
    Mathijssen NM; Sturm PD; Pilot P; Bloem RM; Buma P; Petit PL; Schreurs BW
    Cell Tissue Bank; 2013 Dec; 14(4):615-20. PubMed ID: 23358959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Bone grafts in hip prosthesis revisions].
    Krbec M; Adler J; Messner P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2003; 70(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 12807040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The mechanical stability of allografts after a cleaning process: comparison of two preparation modes.
    Putzer D; Huber DC; Wurm A; Schmoelz W; Nogler M
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Aug; 29(8):1642-6. PubMed ID: 24793889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contamination of banked femoral head allograft: incidence, bacteriology and donor follow up.
    Sommerville SM; Johnson N; Bryce SL; Journeaux SF; Morgan DA
    Aust N Z J Surg; 2000 Jul; 70(7):480-4. PubMed ID: 10901573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microbiological cultures of allografts of the femoral head just before transplantation.
    van de Pol GJ; Sturm PD; van Loon CJ; Verhagen C; Schreurs BW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Sep; 89(9):1225-8. PubMed ID: 17905962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stiffness and compactness of morselized grafts during impaction: an in vitro study with human femoral heads.
    Bavadekar A; Cornu O; Godts B; Delloye C; Van Tomme J; Banse X
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2001 Oct; 72(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 11728073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone graft for revision hip arthroplasty: biology and future applications.
    Gamradt SC; Lieberman JR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Dec; (417):183-94. PubMed ID: 14646716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Incorporation of bone allografts with the use of Octopus revision system in total hip arthroplasty].
    Vojtassák J; Jány R
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(4):210-3. PubMed ID: 15456098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening femoral heads from living donors: a prospective study comparing swab-agar versus bone fragment-broth culture.
    Saegeman V; Verhaegen J; Simon JP
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2011 Jun; 77(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 21846008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microbial contamination of femoral head allografts.
    Chiu CK; Lau PY; Chan SW; Fong CM; Sun LK
    Hong Kong Med J; 2004 Dec; 10(6):401-5. PubMed ID: 15591599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of two cleaning processes for bone allografts on gentamicin impregnation and in vitro antibiotic release.
    Coraça-Huber DC; Hausdorfer J; Fille M; Steidl M; Nogler M
    Cell Tissue Bank; 2013 Jun; 14(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 22581168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing the grain size distribution of allografts in bone impaction grafting.
    Putzer D; Coraça-Huber D; Wurm A; Schmoelz W; Nogler M
    J Orthop Res; 2014 Aug; 32(8):1024-9. PubMed ID: 24797323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impaction bone grafting using freeze-dried allograft in revision hip arthroplasty.
    de Roeck NJ; Drabu KJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Feb; 16(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 11222894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impaction bone grafting: a laboratory comparison of two methods.
    Putzer D; Mayr E; Haid C; Reinthaler A; Nogler M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Aug; 93(8):1049-53. PubMed ID: 21768627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reinforcement of deficient femur with inlay strut grafts in revision hip arthroplasty: a small series.
    Otte S; Fitzek J; Wedemeyer C; Löer F; von Knoch M; Saxler G
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Dec; 126(10):649-53. PubMed ID: 16927095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impaction bone grafting with hydroxyapatite: increased femoral component stability in experiments using Sawbones.
    Fujishiro T; Nishikawa T; Niikura T; Takikawa S; Nishiyama T; Mizuno K; Yoshiya S; Kurosaka M
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Aug; 76(4):550-4. PubMed ID: 16195073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grafting for periprosthetic femoral fractures: strut, impaction or femoral replacement.
    Tsiridis E; Spence G; Gamie Z; El Masry MA; Giannoudis PV
    Injury; 2007 Jun; 38(6):688-97. PubMed ID: 17466991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bacterial contamination of femoral head allografts from living donors.
    Vehmeyer SB; Slooff AR; Bloem RM; Petit PL
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Apr; 73(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 12079013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microbiological culture results for the femoral head. Are they important to the donor?
    James LA; Ibrahim T; Esler CN
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2004 Aug; 86(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 15330017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ordering allograft by weight: suggestions for the efficient use of frozen bone-graft for impaction grafting.
    Henman P; Finlayson D
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Apr; 15(3):368-71. PubMed ID: 10794234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.