These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23359398)

  • 1. Single-use instrumentation, cutting blocks, and trials decrease contamination during total knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of navigated and nonnavigated cases.
    Mont MA; Johnson AJ; Issa K; Pivec R; Blasser KE; McQueen D; Puri L; Dethmers DA; Miller DW; Ireland PH; Shurman JR; Bonutti P
    J Knee Surg; 2013 Aug; 26(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 23359398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-use instruments, cutting blocks, and trials increase efficiency in the operating room during total knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of navigated and non-navigated cases.
    Mont MA; McElroy MJ; Johnson AJ; Pivec R;
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Aug; 28(7):1135-40. PubMed ID: 23721905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-use cutting blocks and trials lower costs in primary total knee arthroplasty.
    Mont MA; Pivec R; Johnson AJ; Issa K
    Surg Technol Int; 2012 Dec; 22():331-5. PubMed ID: 23109073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Procedure simplification: the role of single-use instruments in total knee arthroplasty.
    Bhadra AK; Kwiecien GJ; Harwin SF; Johnson AJ; Mont MA; Malkani AL
    Surg Technol Int; 2012 Dec; 22():326-30. PubMed ID: 23023576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of custom total knee cutting blocks.
    Slover JD; Rubash HE; Malchau H; Bosco JA
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Feb; 27(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 21676584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single-Use Instrumentation Technologies in Knee Arthroplasty: State of the Art.
    Dell'Osso G; Celli F; Bottai V; Bugelli G; Citarelli C; Agostini G; Guido G; Giannotti S
    Surg Technol Int; 2016 Apr; 28():243-6. PubMed ID: 27121411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Training benefits of computer navigated total knee arthroplasty.
    Love GJ; Kinninmonth AW
    Knee; 2013 Aug; 20(4):236-41. PubMed ID: 23062657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequential versus automated cutting guides in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.
    Koulalis D; O'Loughlin PF; Plaskos C; Kendoff D; Cross MB; Pearle AD
    Knee; 2011 Dec; 18(6):436-42. PubMed ID: 20837395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adjustable cutting blocks for computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
    Koulalis D; O'Loughlin PF; Plaskos C; Kendoff D; Pearle AD
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Aug; 25(5):807-11. PubMed ID: 19679441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost Analysis and Surgical Site Infection Rates in Total Knee Arthroplasty Comparing Traditional vs. Single-Use Instrumentation.
    Siegel GW; Patel NN; Milshteyn MA; Buzas D; Lombardo DJ; Morawa LG
    J Arthroplasty; 2015 Dec; 30(12):2271-4. PubMed ID: 26231077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. No need to change the skin knife in modern arthroplasty surgery.
    Ottesen C; Skovby A; Troelsen A; Specht C; Friis-Møller A; Husted H
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Aug; 134(8):1163-6. PubMed ID: 24643774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Displays mounted on cutting blocks reduce the learning curve in navigated total knee arthroplasty.
    Schnurr C; Eysel P; König DP
    Comput Aided Surg; 2011; 16(5):249-56. PubMed ID: 21824041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Single use custom made instrumentation, the future of total knee arthroplasty?].
    Spaltenstein M; Allami B; Gardon R; Jolles BM
    Rev Med Suisse; 2014 Dec; 10(455):2424-8. PubMed ID: 25752014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Specialized instruments and modular implants for minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.
    Coon TM
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2006 Jul; 35(7 Suppl):12-7. PubMed ID: 16927648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of measures to decrease intra-operative bacterial contamination in orthopaedic implant surgery.
    Knobben BA; van Horn JR; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ
    J Hosp Infect; 2006 Feb; 62(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 16343691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the importance of instrumentation.
    Tria AJ
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 35(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 15062708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The rationale for navigated minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement.
    Jenny JY; Ciobanu E; Boeri C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():58-62. PubMed ID: 17572633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Does the tibial component remain at malposition risk?
    Bové JC
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Sep; 96(5):536-42. PubMed ID: 20605549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The benefits of customized patient instrumentation to lower-volume joint replacement surgeons: results from practice.
    Johnson DR
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2011 Nov; 40(11 Suppl):13-6. PubMed ID: 22263217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty surgery through navigated freehand bone cutting: winner of the 2005 "HAP" PAUL AWARD.
    Haider H; Barrera OA; Garvin KL
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jun; 22(4):535-42. PubMed ID: 17562410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.