BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23360424)

  • 21. Association of Clinician Diagnostic Performance With Machine Learning-Based Decision Support Systems: A Systematic Review.
    Vasey B; Ursprung S; Beddoe B; Taylor EH; Marlow N; Bilbro N; Watkinson P; McCulloch P
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Mar; 4(3):e211276. PubMed ID: 33704476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A taxonomic description of computer-based clinical decision support systems.
    Berlin A; Sorani M; Sim I
    J Biomed Inform; 2006 Dec; 39(6):656-67. PubMed ID: 16442854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects and characteristics of clinical decision support systems on the outcomes of patients with kidney disease: a systematic review.
    Mirpanahi N; Nabovati E; Sharif R; Amirazodi S; Karami M
    Hosp Pract (1995); 2023 Aug; 51(3):110-123. PubMed ID: 37068105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Computerized decision support systems: EBM at the bedside].
    Capobussi M; Banzi R; Moja L; Bonovas S; González-Lorenzo M; Liberati EG; Polo Friz H; Nanni O; Mangia M; Ruggiero F
    Recenti Prog Med; 2016 Nov; 107(11):589-591. PubMed ID: 27869877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Review of computerized clinical decision support in community pharmacy.
    Curtain C; Peterson GM
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2014 Aug; 39(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 24806361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research.
    Johnston ME; Langton KB; Haynes RB; Mathieu A
    Ann Intern Med; 1994 Jan; 120(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 8256973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve diabetes management? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jeffery R; Iserman E; Haynes RB;
    Diabet Med; 2013 Jun; 30(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 23199102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How intervention studies measure the effectiveness of medication safety-related clinical decision support systems in primary and long-term care: a systematic review.
    Lampe D; Grosser J; Grothe D; Aufenberg B; Gensorowsky D; Witte J; Greiner W
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2024 Jul; 24(1):188. PubMed ID: 38965569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of clinical decision support systems for kidney-related drug prescribing: a systematic review.
    Tawadrous D; Shariff SZ; Haynes RB; Iansavichus AV; Jain AK; Garg AX
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2011 Dec; 58(6):903-14. PubMed ID: 21944664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical decision support systems in the pediatric intensive care unit.
    Mack EH; Wheeler DS; Embi PJ
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2009 Jan; 10(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 19057443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Do providers use computerized clinical decision support systems? A systematic review and meta-regression of clinical decision support uptake.
    Kouri A; Yamada J; Lam Shin Cheung J; Van de Velde S; Gupta S
    Implement Sci; 2022 Mar; 17(1):21. PubMed ID: 35272667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development and implementation of computerized clinical guidelines: barriers and solutions.
    Trivedi MH; Kern JK; Marcee A; Grannemann B; Kleiber B; Bettinger T; Altshuler KZ; McClelland A
    Methods Inf Med; 2002; 41(5):435-42. PubMed ID: 12501817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Implementing an evidence-based computerized decision support system linked to electronic health records to improve care for cancer patients: the ONCO-CODES study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Moja L; Passardi A; Capobussi M; Banzi R; Ruggiero F; Kwag K; Liberati EG; Mangia M; Kunnamo I; Cinquini M; Vespignani R; Colamartini A; Di Iorio V; Massa I; González-Lorenzo M; Bertizzolo L; Nyberg P; Grimshaw J; Bonovas S; Nanni O
    Implement Sci; 2016 Nov; 11(1):153. PubMed ID: 27884165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Implementation of multiple-domain covering computerized decision support systems in primary care: a focus group study on perceived barriers.
    Lugtenberg M; Weenink JW; van der Weijden T; Westert GP; Kool RB
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Oct; 15():82. PubMed ID: 26459233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of computerized decision support systems on cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Groenhof TKJ; Asselbergs FW; Groenwold RHH; Grobbee DE; Visseren FLJ; Bots ML;
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Jun; 19(1):108. PubMed ID: 31182084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Availability and usage of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) in office-based primary care settings in the USA.
    Jing X; Himawan L; Law T
    BMJ Health Care Inform; 2019 Dec; 26(1):. PubMed ID: 31818828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An informatics-supported intervention improves diabetes control in a primary care setting.
    Ziemer DC; Tsui C; Caudle J; Barnes CS; Dames F; Phillips LS
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():1160. PubMed ID: 17238779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Exposure to and experiences with a computerized decision support intervention in primary care: results from a process evaluation.
    Lugtenberg M; Pasveer D; van der Weijden T; Westert GP; Kool RB
    BMC Fam Pract; 2015 Oct; 16():141. PubMed ID: 26474603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.