These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2336140)

  • 1. [MR imaging of cervical disc disease: value GRASS imaging].
    Hida K; Akino M; Iwasaki Y; Isu T; Abe H; Matsuzawa H; Nomura M; Saitoh H
    No Shinkei Geka; 1990 Feb; 18(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 2336140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gradient echo (GRASS) MR imaging in cervical radiculopathy.
    Hedberg MC; Drayer BP; Flom RA; Hodak JA; Bird CR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Mar; 150(3):683-9. PubMed ID: 2829610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Magnetic resonance myelography. Preliminary experience].
    Crispino M; Gasparotti R; Pavia M; Bonetti M; Pittiani F; Prandini F; Chiesa A
    Radiol Med; 1995; 89(1-2):42-8. PubMed ID: 7716310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of myelography, CT myelography and magnetic resonance imaging in cervical spondylosis and disk herniation. Pre- and postoperative findings.
    Larsson EM; Holtås S; Cronqvist S; Brandt L
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 2736175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic resonance imaging compared with computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of spinal masses.
    Fenzl G; Heywang SH; Lissner J; Steinhoff H; Vogl T; Fink U; Obermüller J; Einhüpl K
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1986; 369():257-9. PubMed ID: 2980468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-dimensional MRI at 1.5 and 0.5 T versus CT myelography in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy.
    Bartlett RJ; Hill CA; Devlin R; Gardiner ED
    Neuroradiology; 1996 Feb; 38(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 8692425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical spine: MR imaging with a partial flip angle, gradient-refocused pulse sequence. Part I. General considerations and disk disease.
    Enzmann DR; Rubin JB
    Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):467-72. PubMed ID: 3336722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between magnetization transfer contrast and fast spin-echo MR imaging of degenerative disease of the cervical spine at 0.3 T.
    Yoshioka H; Onaya H; Itai Y; Nishimura H; Matsumura A; Tsunoda T; Kandatsu S; Koga M; Yoshikawa K; Kato H; Tsujii H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 9084023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Magnetic resonance imaging of diseased cervical and lumbar intervertebral discs].
    Kadoya S; Nakamura T; Takarada A; Yamamoto I; Sato S
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 1989 Feb; 29(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 2475812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Improved magnetic resonance myelography using image fusion].
    Eberhardt K; Ganslandt O; Stadlbauer A
    Rofo; 2013 Apr; 185(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 23348124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical disk disease.
    Russell EJ
    Radiology; 1990 Nov; 177(2):313-25. PubMed ID: 2217760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance imaging of intervertebral disk disease. Clinical and pulse sequence considerations.
    Modic MT; Pavlicek W; Weinstein MA; Boumphrey F; Ngo F; Hardy R; Duchesneau PM
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 6729099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imaging of degenerative disease of the cervical spine.
    Modic MT; Ross JS; Masaryk TJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Feb; (239):109-20. PubMed ID: 2912610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of MR and CT myelography in imaging the cervical and thoracic spine.
    Karnaze MG; Gado MH; Sartor KJ; Hodges FJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Feb; 150(2):397-403. PubMed ID: 3257332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Cervical soft disc. Clinical analysis of 35 cases].
    Hanakita J; Suwa H; Nagayasu S; Suzuki T; Nishi S; Ohta F
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 1988 Dec; 28(12):1175-80. PubMed ID: 2468096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Klippel-Feil syndrome: CT and MR of acquired and congenital abnormalities of cervical spine and cord.
    Ulmer JL; Elster AD; Ginsberg LE; Williams DW
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 8454748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short TR, variable flip angle, gradient echo scans of the cervical spine: comparison of 2DFT and 3DFT techniques.
    Enzmann D; Rubin JB
    Neuroradiology; 1989; 31(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 2779770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnosis of cervical disc disease. MRI versus cervical myelography.
    Perneczky G; Böck FW; Neuhold A; Stiskal M
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 1992; 116(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 1615768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical spine MR imaging using multislice gradient echo imaging: comparison with cardiac gated spin echo.
    Kulkarni MV; Narayana PA; McArdle CB; Yeakley JW; Campagna NF; Wehrli FW
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1988; 6(5):517-25. PubMed ID: 3226236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Two cases of cervical disc disease with intramedullary pathological changes, which are responsible for their neurological syndromes, on delayed CT myelography].
    Isu T; Iwasaki Y; Abe H; Tashiro K; Murai H; Miyasaka K
    No Shinkei Geka; 1987 Aug; 15(8):837-41. PubMed ID: 3431650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.