These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23362004)

  • 1. On collegiality and role models.
    Khuri FR
    Cancer; 2013 Mar; 119(5):928-30. PubMed ID: 23362004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review and accountability.
    Hardy LK
    Can J Nurs Res; 1991; 23(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 1802369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
    Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
    Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perfecting peer review?
    Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21217648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review in scientific journals--what good is it?
    Relman AS
    West J Med; 1990 Nov; 153(5):520-2. PubMed ID: 2260288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transparent peer review--an appreciation of the reviewers' contribution to a published article.
    Linder S; Schliwa M; Werner S; Gebauer D
    Eur J Cell Biol; 2010 Nov; 89(11):779. PubMed ID: 20813427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Who referees the referees?
    Isbister WH
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1992 Mar; 62(3):173-4. PubMed ID: 1550501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thoughts of a manuscript reviewer.
    Bluestone N
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1996; 59(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 9074317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Reviewers: arbiters or consultants?].
    Naccarella F
    G Ital Cardiol; 1993 Jul; 23(7):748-51. PubMed ID: 8405843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Editors' review of 2006 and the BJCP prize.
    Aronson JK; Lennard MS; Ritter JM; Begg EJ; Lewis LD; Schachter M
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2007 Jan; 63(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 17229039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The discourteous reviewer.
    Leviton A
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Each year more than 1,000 manuscripts are submitted for our consideration.
    Soc Sci Med; 1989; 29(7):I-II. PubMed ID: 2799420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cultivating peer review.
    Dellavalle RP
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Dec; 55(6):1113-5. PubMed ID: 17097410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistics, authors, and reviewers: the heart of the matter.
    Curran-Everett D; Benos DJ
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):80. PubMed ID: 19261765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flaws documented, reforms debated at congress on journal peer review.
    Cotton P
    JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(23):2775-8. PubMed ID: 8133598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The peer review process and JSES procedures.
    Iannotti JP; Mallon WJ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Feb; 22(2):149. PubMed ID: 23352468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing peer review.
    Pourquié O; Brown K
    Development; 2015 Apr; 142(8):1389. PubMed ID: 25852196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review.
    Raza A; Preisler HD
    Ann Intern Med; 1985 Sep; 103(3):470-1. PubMed ID: 4026093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review: A critical cog in the scholarship wheel.
    Zavod RM
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018; 10(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 29248064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.