These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. How does peer review work? Aaron L Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Peer review in scientific journals--what good is it? Relman AS West J Med; 1990 Nov; 153(5):520-2. PubMed ID: 2260288 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Transparent peer review--an appreciation of the reviewers' contribution to a published article. Linder S; Schliwa M; Werner S; Gebauer D Eur J Cell Biol; 2010 Nov; 89(11):779. PubMed ID: 20813427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Who referees the referees? Isbister WH Aust N Z J Surg; 1992 Mar; 62(3):173-4. PubMed ID: 1550501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Thoughts of a manuscript reviewer. Bluestone N Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1996; 59(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 9074317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Reviewers: arbiters or consultants?]. Naccarella F G Ital Cardiol; 1993 Jul; 23(7):748-51. PubMed ID: 8405843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Editors' review of 2006 and the BJCP prize. Aronson JK; Lennard MS; Ritter JM; Begg EJ; Lewis LD; Schachter M Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2007 Jan; 63(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 17229039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The discourteous reviewer. Leviton A Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Each year more than 1,000 manuscripts are submitted for our consideration. Soc Sci Med; 1989; 29(7):I-II. PubMed ID: 2799420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]