112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23362759)
1. A new approach to characterize emission contributions from area sources during optical remote sensing technique testing.
Abichou T; Clark J; Chanton J; Hater G; Green R; Goldsmith D; Barlaz M; Swan N
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Dec; 62(12):1403-10. PubMed ID: 23362759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of vertical radial plume mapping technique in measuring lagoon gas emissions.
Viguria M; Ro KS; Stone KC; Johnson MH
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Apr; 65(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 25947209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uncertainties associated with the use of optical remote sensing technique to estimate surface emissions in landfill applications.
Abichou T; Clark J; Tan S; Chanton J; Hater G; Green R; Goldsmith D; Barlaz MA; Swan N
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Apr; 60(4):460-70. PubMed ID: 20437781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methane emissions from 20 landfills across the United States using vertical radial plume mapping.
Goldsmith CD; Chanton J; Abichou T; Swan N; Green R; Haters G
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Feb; 62(2):183-97. PubMed ID: 22442934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement of greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural sites using open-path optical remote sensing method.
Ro KS; Johnson MH; Varma RM; Hashmonay RA; Hunt P
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2009 Aug; 44(10):1011-8. PubMed ID: 19827493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Developing particle emission inventories using remote sensing (PEIRS).
Tang CH; Coull BA; Schwartz J; Lyapustin AI; Di Q; Koutrakis P
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Jan; 67(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 27653469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Locating pollutant emission sources with optical remote sensing measurements and an improved one-dimensional radial plume mapping technique.
Wu CF; Lin SC; Yeh CK
J Environ Monit; 2012 Apr; 14(4):1203-10. PubMed ID: 22382995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the MOVES2010a, MOBILE6.2, and EMFAC2007 mobile source emission models with on-road traffic tunnel and remote sensing measurements.
Fujita EM; Campbell DE; Zielinska B; Chow JC; Lindhjem CE; DenBleyker A; Bishop GA; Schuchmann BG; Stedman DH; Lawson DR
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Oct; 62(10):1134-49. PubMed ID: 23155860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.
Coull BA; Bobb JF; Wellenius GA; Kioumourtzoglou MA; Mittleman MA; Koutrakis P; Godleski JJ
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):5-50. PubMed ID: 26333238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and application of an aerosol screening model for size-resolved urban aerosols.
Stanier CO; Lee SR;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2014 Jun; (179):3-79. PubMed ID: 25145039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends and spatial patterns of fine-resolution aerosol optical depth-derived PM
Tang CH; Coull BA; Schwartz J; Di Q; Koutrakis P
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Jan; 67(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 27624350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optical remote sensing to quantify fugitive particulate mass emissions from stationary short-term and mobile continuous sources: part II. Field applications.
Du K; Yuen W; Wang W; Rood MJ; Varma RM; Hashmonay RA; Kim BJ; Kemme MR
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(2):666-72. PubMed ID: 21142143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.
Park ES; Symanski E; Han D; Spiegelman C
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):51-113. PubMed ID: 26333239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new method to compare vehicle emissions measured by remote sensing and laboratory testing: high-emitters and potential implications for emission inventories.
Smit R; Bluett J
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jun; 409(13):2626-34. PubMed ID: 21514628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantifying methane emission from fugitive sources by combining tracer release and downwind measurements - a sensitivity analysis based on multiple field surveys.
Mønster JG; Samuelsson J; Kjeldsen P; Rella CW; Scheutz C
Waste Manag; 2014 Aug; 34(8):1416-28. PubMed ID: 24759753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interinstrument comparison of remote-sensing devices and a new method for calculating on-road nitrogen oxides emissions and validation of vehicle-specific power.
Rushton CE; Tate JE; Shepherd SP; Carslaw DC
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Feb; 68(2):111-122. PubMed ID: 28287911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of volatile organic compound and hazardous air pollutant emissions from oil and natural gas well pads using mobile remote and on-site direct measurements.
Brantley HL; Thoma ED; Eisele AP
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Sep; 65(9):1072-82. PubMed ID: 26067676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tackling nitric oxide emissions from dominant diesel vehicle models using on-road remote sensing technology.
Huang Y; Yam YS; Lee CKC; Organ B; Zhou JL; Surawski NC; Chan EFC; Hong G
Environ Pollut; 2018 Dec; 243(Pt B):1177-1185. PubMed ID: 30266007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
