These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23363111)
1. Maturation of the human medial efferent reflex revisited. Abdala C; Mishra S; Garinis A J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):938-50. PubMed ID: 23363111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Aging of the medial olivocochlear reflex and associations with speech perception. Abdala C; Dhar S; Ahmadi M; Luo P J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb; 135(2):754-65. PubMed ID: 25234884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Considering distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure in measurements of the medial olivocochlear reflex. Abdala C; Mishra SK; Williams TL J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):1584-94. PubMed ID: 19275316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stability of the medial olivocochlear reflex as measured by distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Mishra SK; Abdala C J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 58(1):122-34. PubMed ID: 25320951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frequency tuning of medial-olivocochlear-efferent acoustic reflexes in humans as functions of probe frequency. Lilaonitkul W; Guinan JJ J Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 107(6):1598-611. PubMed ID: 22190630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of aging on medial olivocochlear system function. Lisowska G; Namyslowski G; Orecka B; Misiolek M Clin Interv Aging; 2014; 9():901-14. PubMed ID: 24959071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The relationship between MOC reflex and masked threshold. Garinis A; Werner L; Abdala C Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):128-37. PubMed ID: 21878379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in amplitude and phase of distortion-product otoacoustic emission fine-structure and separated components during efferent activation. Henin S; Thompson S; Abdelrazeq S; Long GR J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2068-79. PubMed ID: 21476662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence for a bipolar change in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during contralateral acoustic stimulation in humans. Müller J; Janssen T; Heppelmann G; Wagner W J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Dec; 118(6):3747-56. PubMed ID: 16419819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement of medial olivocochlear efferent activity in humans: comparison of different distortion product otoacoustic emission-based paradigms. Wagner W; Heyd A Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1379-88. PubMed ID: 21921859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and the middle-ear muscle reflex in human ears. Sun XM Hear Res; 2008 Mar; 237(1-2):66-75. PubMed ID: 18258398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure is responsible for variability of distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression. Sun XM J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4310-20. PubMed ID: 18537382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frequency specificity and left-ear advantage of medial olivocochlear efferent modulation: a study based on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission. Xing D; Gong Q Neuroreport; 2017 Sep; 28(13):775-778. PubMed ID: 28538522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transient otoacoustic emissions in the detection of olivocochlear bundle maturation. Gkoritsa E; Tsakanikos M; Korres S; Dellagrammaticas H; Apostolopoulos N; Ferekidis E Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Apr; 70(4):671-6. PubMed ID: 16198429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]