These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23363272)
1. A Bayesian method and its variational approximation for prediction of genomic breeding values in multiple traits. Hayashi T; Iwata H BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Jan; 14():34. PubMed ID: 23363272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EM algorithm for Bayesian estimation of genomic breeding values. Hayashi T; Iwata H BMC Genet; 2010 Jan; 11():3. PubMed ID: 20092655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genome-enabled prediction of meat and carcass traits using Bayesian regression, single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction and blending methods in Nelore cattle. Lopes FB; Baldi F; Passafaro TL; Brunes LC; Costa MFO; Eifert EC; Narciso MG; Rosa GJM; Lobo RB; Magnabosco CU Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100006. PubMed ID: 33516009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population. Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reduction in accuracy of genomic prediction for ordered categorical data compared to continuous observations. Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):37. PubMed ID: 24912924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temporal dynamics of genetic parameters and SNP effects for performance and disorder traits in poultry undergoing genomic selection. Richter J; Hidalgo J; Bussiman F; Breen V; Misztal I; Lourenco D J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 38576313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multibreed genomic prediction using multitrait genomic residual maximum likelihood and multitask Bayesian variable selection. Calus MPL; Goddard ME; Wientjes YCJ; Bowman PJ; Hayes BJ J Dairy Sci; 2018 May; 101(5):4279-4294. PubMed ID: 29550121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of Bayesian and BLUP alphabets for genomic prediction: analysis, comparison and results. Meher PK; Rustgi S; Kumar A Heredity (Edinb); 2022 Jun; 128(6):519-530. PubMed ID: 35508540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MAK: a machine learning framework improved genomic prediction via multi-target ensemble regressor chains and automatic selection of assistant traits. Liang M; Cao S; Deng T; Du L; Li K; An B; Du Y; Xu L; Zhang L; Gao X; Li J; Guo P; Gao H Brief Bioinform; 2023 Mar; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 36752363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A computationally efficient algorithm for genomic prediction using a Bayesian model. Wang T; Chen YP; Goddard ME; Meuwissen TH; Kemper KE; Hayes BJ Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):34. PubMed ID: 25926276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bayesian methods for jointly estimating genomic breeding values of one continuous and one threshold trait. Wang C; Li X; Qian R; Su G; Zhang Q; Ding X PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175448. PubMed ID: 28410429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of multi-trait Bayesian decision theory for parental genomic selection. Villar-Hernández BJ; Pérez-Elizalde S; Martini JWR; Toledo F; Perez-Rodriguez P; Krause M; García-Calvillo ID; Covarrubias-Pazaran G; Crossa J G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33693601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using selection index theory to estimate consistency of multi-locus linkage disequilibrium across populations. Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Calus MP BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 26187501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multi-Trait Genomic Prediction of Yield-Related Traits in US Soft Wheat under Variable Water Regimes. Guo J; Khan J; Pradhan S; Shahi D; Khan N; Avci M; Mcbreen J; Harrison S; Brown-Guedira G; Murphy JP; Johnson J; Mergoum M; Esten Mason R; Ibrahim AMH; Sutton R; Griffey C; Babar MA Genes (Basel); 2020 Oct; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 33126620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of prior specifications in a shrinkage-inducing Bayesian model for quantitative trait mapping and genomic prediction. Knürr T; Läärä E; Sillanpää MJ Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):24. PubMed ID: 23834140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of genomic prediction methods for early growth traits of Inner Mongolia cashmere goats based on multi trait models. Gao LY; Xu Q; He YX; Xi HJ; Liu YF; Zhang T; Li JQ; Zhang YJ; Wang RJ; Lü Q; Mei BJ; Su R; Wang ZY Yi Chuan; 2024 May; 46(5):421-430. PubMed ID: 38763776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of multi-trait genomic selection using different methods. Calus MP; Veerkamp RF Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Jul; 43(1):26. PubMed ID: 21729282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods. Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genomic prediction ability for feed efficiency traits using different models and pseudo-phenotypes under several validation strategies in Nelore cattle. Brunes LC; Baldi F; Lopes FB; Narciso MG; Lobo RB; Espigolan R; Costa MFO; Magnabosco CU Animal; 2021 Feb; 15(2):100085. PubMed ID: 33573965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]