These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. [Evaluation of the role of mammography and echography in breast diseases in a controlled caseload]. Gozzi G; Stacul F; Bassini A; Macorig D; Ukovich W Radiol Med; 1990 Oct; 80(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 2244035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computerized follow-up of abnormalities detected at mammography screening. Monticciolo DL; Sickles EA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Oct; 155(4):751-3. PubMed ID: 2119104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [An information system for the management support of a radiology institute. Critical analysis and experience]. Ukovich W; Stacul F; Cova MA; Carbi N Radiol Med; 1989; 78(1-2):94-100. PubMed ID: 2675206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. InfoRAD explores strategies for integrating images, data. Tilke B Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Jan; Suppl():IR23-5. PubMed ID: 11692360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Central online quality assurance in radiology: an IT solution exemplified by the German Breast Cancer Screening Program]. Czwoydzinski J; Girnus R; Sommer A; Heindel W; Lenzen H Rofo; 2011 Sep; 183(9):849-54. PubMed ID: 21830180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. One- versus two-view mammography screening. A prospective population-based study. Thurfjell E; Taube A; Tabár L Acta Radiol; 1994 Jul; 35(4):340-4. PubMed ID: 8011382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Diagnostic role of mammography and clinical examination in the framework of a screening program for breast carcinoma in Brescia]. Filippini L; Pinelli D; Bettoni C; Bianchi A; Perna F; Lucini L; Vaiana R; Braga M Minerva Med; 1996 Nov; 87(11):531-8. PubMed ID: 9045104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Recommendations of the French Society of Mammography and Breast Pathology on quality criteria in mass screening for breast cancer in France]. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1994 Oct; 89(10):510-1. PubMed ID: 7817080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Baseline screening mammography with one versus two views. Anttinen I; Pamilo M; Roiha M; Soiva M; Suramo I Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):241-3. PubMed ID: 2591390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors associated with imaging and procedural events used to detect breast cancer after screening mammography. Carney PA; Abraham LA; Miglioretti DL; Yabroff KR; Sickles EA; Buist DS; Kasales CJ; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Dignan MB; Weaver DL; Kerlikowske K; AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 17242246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammography for screening high-risk patients for cancer: value of including a lateral projection. Kreager JA; Kornguth PJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):295-7. PubMed ID: 8310913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Role of mammography in women under 35 years of age]. Panzarola P; Bellucci MC Radiol Med; 1991; 81(1-2):62-4. PubMed ID: 2006338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]