239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23365035)
41. Greater perceived helplessness in osteoarthritis predicts outcome of joint replacement surgery.
Gandhi R; Razak F; Tso P; Davey JR; Mahomed NN
J Rheumatol; 2009 Jul; 36(7):1507-11. PubMed ID: 19487268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement.
Quintana JM; Escobar A; Bilbao A; Arostegui I; Lafuente I; Vidaurreta I
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2005 Dec; 13(12):1076-83. PubMed ID: 16154777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. German short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire (SMFA-D): comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC in a prospective evaluation in patients with primary osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty.
Kirschner S; Walther M; Böhm D; Matzer M; Heesen T; Faller H; König A
Rheumatol Int; 2003 Jan; 23(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12548437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Patients with severe radiographic osteoarthritis have a better prognosis in physical functioning after hip and knee replacement: a cohort-study.
Keurentjes JC; Fiocco M; So-Osman C; Onstenk R; Koopman-Van Gemert AW; Pöll RG; Kroon HM; Vliet Vlieland TP; Nelissen RG
PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e59500. PubMed ID: 23573200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Using patients' and rheumatologists' opinions to specify a short form of the WOMAC function subscale.
Tubach F; Baron G; Falissard B; Logeart I; Dougados M; Bellamy N; Ravaud P
Ann Rheum Dis; 2005 Jan; 64(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 15608303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Patient acceptable symptom state and OMERACT-OARSI set of responder criteria in joint replacement. Identification of cut-off values.
Escobar A; Gonzalez M; Quintana JM; Vrotsou K; Bilbao A; Herrera-Espiñeira C; Garcia-Perez L; Aizpuru F; Sarasqueta C
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2012 Feb; 20(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 22155074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in patients following total hip or knee replacement.
Jin X; Al Sayah F; Ohinmaa A; Marshall DA; Johnson JA
Qual Life Res; 2019 Sep; 28(9):2409-2417. PubMed ID: 31089988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Waiting list management: priority criteria or first-in first-out? A case for total joint replacement.
Escobar A; Quintana JM; González M; Bilbao A; Ibañez B
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Aug; 15(4):595-601. PubMed ID: 19674214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparison of 5-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROMs) of Total Ankle Replacement (TAR) to Total Knee Replacement (TKR) and Total Hip Replacement (THR).
Ramaskandhan J; Rashid A; Kometa S; Siddique MS
Foot Ankle Int; 2020 Jul; 41(7):767-774. PubMed ID: 32370645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Return to work and workplace activity limitations following total hip or knee replacement.
Sankar A; Davis AM; Palaganas MP; Beaton DE; Badley EM; Gignac MA
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2013 Oct; 21(10):1485-93. PubMed ID: 23774473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Disability and quality of life of patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis in the primary care setting and factors associated with general practitioners' indication for prosthetic replacement within 1 year.
Boutron I; Rannou F; Jardinaud-Lopez M; Meric G; Revel M; Poiraudeau S
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2008 Sep; 16(9):1024-31. PubMed ID: 18276169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The Alberta Hip and Knee Replacement Project: a model for health technology assessment based on comparative effectiveness of clinical pathways.
Gooch KL; Smith D; Wasylak T; Faris PD; Marshall DA; Khong H; Hibbert JE; Parker RD; Zernicke RF; Beaupre L; Pearce T; Johnston DW; Frank CB
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Apr; 25(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 19366494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Willingness to go through surgery again validated the WOMAC clinically important difference from THR/TKR surgery.
Chesworth BM; Mahomed NN; Bourne RB; Davis AM;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):907-18. PubMed ID: 18687289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Total knee replacement and health-related quality of life: factors influencing long-term outcomes.
Núñez M; Lozano L; Núñez E; Segur JM; Sastre S; Maculé F; Ortega R; Suso S
Arthritis Rheum; 2009 Aug; 61(8):1062-9. PubMed ID: 19644900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Relative effect per patient (REPP)--outcome groups for total hip replacement and total knee replacement].
Huber J; Dabis E; Zumstein MD; Hüsler J
Z Orthop Unfall; 2013 Jun; 151(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 23696160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Relationship between self-reported and performance-based tests in a hip and knee joint replacement population.
Gandhi R; Tsvetkov D; Davey JR; Syed KA; Mahomed NN
Clin Rheumatol; 2009 Mar; 28(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 18853222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. New study design evaluated the validity of measures to assess change after hip or knee arthroplasty.
Stratford PW; Kennedy DM; Riddle DL
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 62(3):347-52. PubMed ID: 18834709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Determinants of the subjective functional outcome of total joint arthroplasty.
Caracciolo B; Giaquinto S
Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2005; 41(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 16085068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Patient relevant outcomes after total hip replacement. A comparison between different surgical techniques.
Nilsdotter AK; Lohmander LS
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2003 Jun; 1():21. PubMed ID: 12816544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Using hierarchical linear modeling to explore predictors of pain after total hip and knee arthroplasty as a consequence of osteoarthritis.
Halket A; Stratford PW; Kennedy DM; Woodhouse LJ
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Feb; 25(2):254-62. PubMed ID: 19625162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
