These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2336541)

  • 1. Harmonic distortion measurements in clinical hearing and fitting. Preliminary report.
    Nielsen HB; Nielsen H; Parving A
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 2336541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between in-situ distortion and hearing aid benefit.
    Cox RM; Taylor IM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Sep; 5(5):317-24. PubMed ID: 7987021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prescribed clinician-fit versus as-worn coupler gain in a group of elderly hearing-aid wearers.
    Humes LE; Barlow NN; Garner CB; Wilson DL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 43(4):879-92. PubMed ID: 11386475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hearing aid fitting outcome: clinical application and psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA).
    Brännström KJ; Wennerström I
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):512-21. PubMed ID: 21034698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing aid fitting (2010).
    Kodera K; Hosoi H; Okamoto M; Manabe T; Kanda Y; Shiraishi K; Sugiuchi T; Suzuki K; Tauchi H; Nishimura T; Matsuhira T; Ishikawa K
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2016 Jun; 43(3):217-28. PubMed ID: 26654157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of hearing aid fittings using insertion gain measurements.
    Ringdahl A; Leijon A; Lidén G
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 6494804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Speech Recall in Hearing Aid Fitting and Outcome Evaluation Under Ecological Test Conditions.
    Lunner T; Rudner M; Rosenbom T; Ågren J; Ng EH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37 Suppl 1():145S-54S. PubMed ID: 27355764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing aids and otosclerosis.
    Johnson EW
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1993 Jun; 26(3):491-502. PubMed ID: 8341576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Candidature for hearing aids: justification for the concept and a two-part audiometric criterion.
    Haggard M; Gatehouse S
    Br J Audiol; 1993 Oct; 27(5):303-18. PubMed ID: 8205076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prescriptive amplification recommendations for hearing losses with a conductive component and their impact on the required maximum power output: an update with accompanying clinical explanation.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):452-60. PubMed ID: 23886423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Physiologico-acoustic aspects of improving speech perception in sensorineural and conductive hearing loss].
    Moroz BS
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1985; 11(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 4007327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Sensible utilization of modern hearing aid technique. II: Multiple channel compression].
    Steffens T
    HNO; 1996 May; 44(5):273-85. PubMed ID: 8707635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Results of the bone-anchored hearing aid in unilateral hearing loss.
    Wazen JJ; Spitzer J; Ghossaini SN; Kacker A; Zschommler A
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):955-8. PubMed ID: 11404603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hearing disability and hearing aid benefit related to type of hearing impairment.
    Carlin WV; Browning GG
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1990 Feb; 15(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 2323083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Distorted Freiburg Speech Test].
    Dieroff HG; Meissner W
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1985 Sep; 64(9):466-9. PubMed ID: 4079625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [New aspects of hearing aid fitting].
    Schorn K; Brügel FJ
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Jan; 73(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8141956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs): an audiometric evaluation.
    Priwin C; Stenfelt S; Granström G; Tjellström A; Håkansson B
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 14709999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimum side for fitting a monaural hearing aid. 1. Patients' preference.
    Swan IR; Browning GG; Gatehouse S
    Br J Audiol; 1987 Feb; 21(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 3828586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid.
    Plomp R; Duquesnoy AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.