These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23365514)

  • 21. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the Beta angle.
    Baik CY; Ververidou M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 15224065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of vertical facial and dentoalveolar changes using panoramic radiography.
    Nohadani N; Ruf S
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 18209215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of Gonial Angle Measurements Using Panoramic Imaging versus Lateral Cephalograms in Adults with Different Mandibular Divergence Patterns.
    Tashkandi NE; Alnaqa NH; Al-Saif NM; Allam E
    J Multidiscip Healthc; 2024; 17():1923-1929. PubMed ID: 38706500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predicting lower third molar eruption on panoramic radiographs after cephalometric comparison of profile and panoramic radiographs.
    Begtrup A; Grønastøð HÁ; Christensen IJ; Kjær I
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Aug; 35(4):460-6. PubMed ID: 22474212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Thin-plate spline (TPS) graphical analysis of the mandible on cephalometric radiographs.
    Chang HP; Liu PH; Chang HF; Chang CH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 12076055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Verification of the symmetry of the mandibular ramus in patients with temporomandibular disorders and asymptomatic individuals: a comparative study.
    Luz JG; Miyazaki LT; Rodrigues L
    Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 2002; 44(3):83-7. PubMed ID: 12784583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mandibular asymmetry: a proposal of radiographic analysis with public domain software.
    Lemos AD; Katz CR; Heimer MV; Rosenblatt A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):52-8. PubMed ID: 25162566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Influence of the Mandibular Gonial Angle on the Incidence of Mandibular Angle Fracture-A Radiomorphometric Study.
    Panneerselvam E; Prasad PJ; Balasubramaniam S; Somasundaram S; Raja KV; Srinivasan D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 75(1):153-159. PubMed ID: 27643630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Correlation of gonial angle size with cortical thickness, height of the mandibular residual body, and duration of edentulism.
    Xie QF; Ainamo A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 15153856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Panoramic imaging is not suitable for quantitative evaluation, classification, and follow up in unilateral condylar hyperplasia.
    Nolte JW; Karssemakers LH; Grootendorst DC; Tuinzing DB; Becking AG
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 53(5):446-50. PubMed ID: 25798757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mandibular asymmetry in different occlusion patterns.
    Sezgin OS; Celenk P; Arici S
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):803-7. PubMed ID: 17685782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluating the effects of functional orthodontic treatment on mandibular osseous structure using fractal dimension analysis of dental panoramic radiographs.
    Cesur E; Bayrak S; Kursun-Çakmak EŞ; Arslan C; Köklü A; Orhan K
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Nov; 90(6):783-793. PubMed ID: 33378509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A study on a method to identify the border between mandibular corpus and ramus on lateral cephalometric radiograph.
    Lin YF; Ono Y; Ono H
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1992 Mar; 39(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 1581998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Panoramic radiographic evaluation of the mandibular morphological changes in elderly dentate and edentulous subjects.
    Joo JK; Lim YJ; Kwon HB; Ahn SJ
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Mar; 71(2):357-62. PubMed ID: 22774938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of horizontal condylar angle and x-ray projection angle on the appearance of the condyle on lateral temporomandibular joint panoramic radiographs.
    Beloor Vasudeva S; Kameko N; Endo A; Okano T
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2012 Dec; 11(4):177-84. PubMed ID: 23208594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of associations between condylar morphology, ramus height, and mandibular plane angle in various vertical skeletal patterns: a digital radiographic study.
    Türker G; Öztürk Yaşar M
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Aug; 22(1):330. PubMed ID: 35941596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Estimation of the gonial angle from the orthopantomogram-- class III case (author's transl)].
    Niwa K; Suzuki Y; Sumikawa Y; Katayama M; Kishimoto T
    Gifu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1981 Nov; 9(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 6955372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of gonial angle determination from cephalograms and orthopantomogram.
    Bhullar MK; Uppal AS; Kochhar GK; Chachra S; Kochhar AS
    Indian J Dent; 2014 Jul; 5(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 25565740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The condylar asymmetry measurements in different skeletal patterns.
    Sağlam AM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jul; 30(7):738-42. PubMed ID: 12791161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Volumetric comparison of mandibular condyles and mandibles in the different skeletal classes in the Saudi population.
    Marghalani HYA
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16750. PubMed ID: 38188155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.