BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23365960)

  • 1. Auditory evoked responses from Ear-EEG recordings.
    Kidmose P; Looney D; Mandic DP
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():586-9. PubMed ID: 23365960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of evoked potentials from ear-EEG.
    Kidmose P; Looney D; Ungstrup M; Rank ML; Mandic DP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Oct; 60(10):2824-30. PubMed ID: 23722447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Real-Life Dry-Contact Ear-EEG.
    Kappel SL; Kidmose P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():5470-5474. PubMed ID: 30441575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dry-Contact Electrode Ear-EEG.
    Kappel SL; Rank ML; Toft HO; Andersen M; Kidmose P
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2019 Jan; 66(1):150-158. PubMed ID: 29993415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying auditory attention with ear-EEG: cEEGrid versus high-density cap-EEG comparison.
    Bleichner MG; Mirkovic B; Debener S
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Dec; 13(6):066004. PubMed ID: 27705963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ear-EEG allows extraction of neural responses in challenging listening scenarios - A future technology for hearing aids?
    Fiedler L; Obleser J; Lunner T; Graversen C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():5697-5700. PubMed ID: 28269548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory Steady-State Responses Across Chirp Repetition Rates For Ear-EEG And Scalp EEG.
    Christensen CB; Kappel SL; Kidmose P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():1376-1379. PubMed ID: 30440648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-density ear-EEG.
    Kappel SL; Kidmose P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():2394-2397. PubMed ID: 29060380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physiological artifacts in scalp EEG and ear-EEG.
    Kappel SL; Looney D; Mandic DP; Kidmose P
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Aug; 16(1):103. PubMed ID: 28800744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ear-EEG compares well to cap-EEG in recording auditory ERPs: a quantification of signal loss.
    Meiser A; Bleichner MG
    J Neural Eng; 2022 Apr; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 35316801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Event-Related Potentials Measured From In and Around the Ear Electrodes Integrated in a Live Hearing Device for Monitoring Sound Perception.
    Denk F; Grzybowski M; Ernst SMA; Kollmeier B; Debener S; Bleichner MG
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518788219. PubMed ID: 30022733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CNT/PDMS-based canal-typed ear electrodes for inconspicuous EEG recording.
    Hoon Lee J; Min Lee S; Jin Byeon H; Sook Hong J; Suk Park K; Lee SH
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Aug; 11(4):046014. PubMed ID: 24963747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EEG Recorded from the Ear: Characterizing the Ear-EEG Method.
    Mikkelsen KB; Kappel SL; Mandic DP; Kidmose P
    Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():438. PubMed ID: 26635514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of the Effect of Spatial Filtering for Detecting Auditory Steady-State Responses Recorded from Ear-EEG.
    Sergeeva A; Christensen CB; Kidmose P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2022 Jul; 2022():56-59. PubMed ID: 36083931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wireless User-Generic Ear EEG.
    Kaveh R; Doong J; Zhou A; Schwendeman C; Gopalan K; Burghardt FL; Arias AC; Maharbiz MM; Muller R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2020 Aug; 14(4):727-737. PubMed ID: 32746342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-density electroencephalogram monitoring in the neonate.
    Fifer WP; Grieve PG; Grose-Fifer J; Isler JR; Byrd D
    Clin Perinatol; 2006 Sep; 33(3):679-91, vii. PubMed ID: 16950319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Miniaturized electroencephalographic scalp electrode for optimal wearing comfort.
    Nikulin VV; Kegeles J; Curio G
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Jul; 121(7):1007-14. PubMed ID: 20227914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Custom-Fitted In- and Around-the-Ear Sensors for Unobtrusive and On-the-Go EEG Acquisitions: Development and Validation.
    Valentin O; Viallet G; Delnavaz A; Cretot-Richert G; Ducharme M; Monsarat-Chanon H; Voix J
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(9):. PubMed ID: 33922456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brain-computer interfaces using capacitive measurement of visual or auditory steady-state responses.
    Baek HJ; Kim HS; Heo J; Lim YG; Park KS
    J Neural Eng; 2013 Apr; 10(2):024001. PubMed ID: 23448913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ear-EEG-Based Objective Hearing Threshold Estimation Evaluated on Normal Hearing Subjects.
    Christensen CB; Harte JM; Lunner T; Kidmose P
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 May; 65(5):1026-1034. PubMed ID: 28796603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.