These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23366010)

  • 1. Effects of tissue dielectric properties on the electric field induced in tDCS: a sensitivity analysis.
    Salvador R; Ramirez F; V'yacheslavovna M; Miranda PC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():787-90. PubMed ID: 23366010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the electric field in the brain during transcranial direct current stimulation: A sensitivity analysis.
    Santos L; Martinho M; Salvador R; Wenger C; Fernandes SR; Ripolles O; Ruffini G; Miranda PC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():1778-1781. PubMed ID: 28268672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of uncertainty in head tissue conductivity and complexity on EEG forward modeling in neonates.
    Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Wallois F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Oct; 37(10):3604-22. PubMed ID: 27238749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of anisotropic conductivity in the skull and white matter on transcranial direct current stimulation via an anatomically realistic finite element head model.
    Suh HS; Lee WH; Kim TS
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6961-80. PubMed ID: 23044667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of inhomogeneous tissue anisotropy on potential distribution within head model.
    Wen P
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2003 Sep; 26(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 14626850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The electric field distribution in the brain during TTFields therapy and its dependence on tissue dielectric properties and anatomy: a computational study.
    Wenger C; Salvador R; Basser PJ; Miranda PC
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 60(18):7339-57. PubMed ID: 26350296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduced spatial focality of electrical field in tDCS with ring electrodes due to tissue anisotropy.
    Suh HS; Lee WH; Cho YS; Kim JH; Kim TS
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2053-6. PubMed ID: 21096150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved EEG source analysis using low-resolution conductivity estimation in a four-compartment finite element head model.
    Lew S; Wolters CH; Anwander A; Makeig S; MacLeod RS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Sep; 30(9):2862-78. PubMed ID: 19117275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling transcranial DC stimulation.
    Oostendorp TF; Hengeveld YA; Wolters CH; Stinstra J; van Elswijk G; Stegeman DF
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4226-9. PubMed ID: 19163645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of electric field distribution in anisotropic cortical and subcortical regions under the influence of tDCS.
    Shahid S; Wen P; Ahfock T
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2014 Jan; 35(1):41-57. PubMed ID: 24122951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigation of tDCS volume conduction effects in a highly realistic head model.
    Wagner S; Rampersad SM; Aydin Ü; Vorwerk J; Oostendorp TF; Neuling T; Herrmann CS; Stegeman DF; Wolters CH
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Feb; 11(1):016002. PubMed ID: 24310982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for anisotropic inhomogeneous head tissue conductivity in human head modelling.
    Bashar MR; Li Y; Wen P
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2010 Jun; 33(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 20502999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computation of the potential distribution in a four-layer anisotropic concentric spherical volume conductor.
    Zhou H; van Oosterom A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Feb; 39(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 1612618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of tissue anisotropy on the radial and tangential components of the electric field in transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Metwally MK; Han SM; Kim TS
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Oct; 53(10):1085-101. PubMed ID: 25940845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental validation of the influence of white matter anisotropy on the intracranial EEG forward solution.
    Bangera NB; Schomer DL; Dehghani N; Ulbert I; Cash S; Papavasiliou S; Eisenberg SR; Dale AM; Halgren E
    J Comput Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 29(3):371-87. PubMed ID: 20063051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A principled approach to conductivity uncertainty analysis in electric field calculations.
    Saturnino GB; Thielscher A; Madsen KH; Knösche TR; Weise K
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():821-834. PubMed ID: 30594684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of the gyral geometry on the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Thielscher A; Opitz A; Windhoff M
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(1):234-43. PubMed ID: 20682353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling skull electrical properties.
    Sadleir RJ; Argibay A
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Oct; 35(10):1699-712. PubMed ID: 17629793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head.
    Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS
    Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visualization of the electric field evoked by transcranial electric stimulation during a craniotomy using the finite element method.
    Tomio R; Akiyama T; Horikoshi T; Ohira T; Yoshida K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Dec; 256():157-67. PubMed ID: 26391774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.