These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23366309)
1. Reliability and validity of the Grip-Ball dynamometer for grip-strength measurement. Chkeir A; Jaber R; Hewson DJ; Duchêne J Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():1996-9. PubMed ID: 23366309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of grip force using the Grip-ball dynamometer. Chkeir A; Jaber R; Hewson DJ; Duchêne J Med Eng Phys; 2013 Nov; 35(11):1698-702. PubMed ID: 23727154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design and validation of the Grip-ball for measurement of hand grip strength. Jaber R; Hewson DJ; Duchêne J Med Eng Phys; 2012 Nov; 34(9):1356-61. PubMed ID: 22925584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring grip strength in older adults: comparing the grip-ball with the Jamar dynamometer. Vermeulen J; Neyens JC; Spreeuwenberg MD; van Rossum E; Hewson DJ; de Witte LP J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2015; 38(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 25594521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and Validity of the Martin Vigorimeter for Grip Strength Measurement in Korean Adults. Lee JK; Jung M; Lee HB; Chung HJ; Lee SH Clin Orthop Surg; 2024 Aug; 16(4):610-619. PubMed ID: 39092298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Study of Reliability and Validity of the Load Cell-Type Hand Dynamometer Compared to the Jamar Dynamometer and the Number of Reliable Grip Strength Measurements. Kanauchi Y; Murase T; Nishiwaki M; Odagiri M; Wanezaki Y; Ishikawa H J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2023 Oct; 28(5):562-572. PubMed ID: 37881817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Grip force monitoring on the hand: Manugraphy system versus Jamar dynamometer. Mühldorfer-Fodor M; Ziegler S; Harms C; Neumann J; Cristalli A; Kalpen A; Kundt G; Mittlmeier T; Prommersberger KJ Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Aug; 134(8):1179-88. PubMed ID: 24935661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity, reliability and test-retest study of Grip strength measurement in two positions with two dynamometers: Jamar® Plus and K-Force® Grip. Cildan Uysal S; Tonak HA; Kitis A Hand Surg Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 41(3):305-310. PubMed ID: 35283336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the strength endurance parameters for the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment (BTE) Simulator II and the Jamar Handgrip Dynamometer. Myers E; Triscari R Work; 2017; 57(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 28506016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity of the Dexter Evaluation System's Jamar dynamometer attachment for assessment of hand grip strength in a normal population. Bellace JV; Healy D; Besser MP; Byron T; Hohman L J Hand Ther; 2000; 13(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 10718222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity and usability of a smart ball-driven serious game to monitor grip strength in independent elderlies. Lunardini F; Borghese NA; Piccini L; Bernardelli G; Cesari M; Ferrante S Health Informatics J; 2020 Sep; 26(3):1952-1968. PubMed ID: 31903859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validating the Capability for Measuring Age-Related Changes in Grip-Force Strength Using a Digital Hand-Held Dynamometer in Healthy Young and Elderly Adults. Lee SC; Wu LC; Chiang SL; Lu LH; Chen CY; Lin CH; Ni CH; Lin CH Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():6936879. PubMed ID: 32382565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of grip strength: validity and reliability of the sphygmomanometer and jamar grip dynamometer. Hamilton GF; McDonald C; Chenier TC J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1992; 16(5):215-9. PubMed ID: 18796752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The reliability and validity of the Tekdyne hand dynamometer: Part I. Stephens JL; Pratt N; Parks B J Hand Ther; 1996; 9(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 8664933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and validity of two hand dynamometers when used by community-dwelling adults aged over 50 years. Huang L; Liu Y; Lin T; Hou L; Song Q; Ge N; Yue J BMC Geriatr; 2022 Jul; 22(1):580. PubMed ID: 35840905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of the grip strength coefficient of variation for detecting sincerity in normal and blocked median nerve in healthy adults. Wachter NJ; Mentzel M; Hütz R; Gülke J Hand Surg Rehabil; 2017 Apr; 36(2):90-96. PubMed ID: 28325433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and validity of the multiaxis profile dynamometer with younger and older participants. Irwin CB; Sesto ME J Hand Ther; 2010; 23(3):281-8; quiz 289. PubMed ID: 20456919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modernising grip dynamometry: Inter-instrument reliability between GripAble and Jamar. Mutalib SA; Mace M; Seager C; Burdet E; Mathiowetz V; Goldsmith N BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jan; 23(1):80. PubMed ID: 35073887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Martin Vigorimeter assesses muscle fatigability in older adults better than the Jamar Dynamometer. De Dobbeleer L; Theou O; Beyer I; Jones GR; Jakobi JM; Bautmans I Exp Gerontol; 2018 Oct; 111():65-70. PubMed ID: 30004005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Martin Vigorimeter Represents a Reliable and More Practical Tool Than the Jamar Dynamometer to Assess Handgrip Strength in the Geriatric Patient. Sipers WM; Verdijk LB; Sipers SJ; Schols JM; van Loon LJ J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2016 May; 17(5):466.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27107163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]