These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23366455)

  • 1. Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform features derived from the brachial cuff volume displacement waveform.
    Butlin M; Qasem A; Avolio AP
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():2591-4. PubMed ID: 23366455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of effects of peripheral vasculature on tonometric radial pulse and cuff-based brachial pulse waveform as used in estimation of central aortic pressures.
    Butlin M; Tan I; Qasem A; Avolio AP
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38083400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating central systolic blood pressure during oscillometric determination of blood pressure: proof of concept and validation by comparison with intra-aortic pressure recording and arterial tonometry.
    Brett SE; Guilcher A; Clapp B; Chowienczyk P
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 22466804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-specific non-invasive estimation of the aortic blood pressure waveform by ultrasound and tonometry.
    Zhou S; Xu K; Fang Y; Alastruey J; Vennin S; Yang J; Wang J; Xu L; Wang X; Greenwald SE
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Apr; 247():108082. PubMed ID: 38422893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-invasive measurement of reservoir pressure parameters from brachial-cuff blood pressure waveforms.
    Peng X; Schultz MG; Picone DS; Dwyer N; Black JA; Roberts-Thomson P; Sharman JE
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2018 Dec; 20(12):1703-1711. PubMed ID: 30450732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of a Suprasystolic Cuff System for Static and Dynamic Representation of the Central Pressure Waveform.
    Tamborini A; Gharib M
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2024 Apr; 13(8):e033290. PubMed ID: 38591330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of the augmentation index and pulse pressure amplification as determined by the SphygmoCor XCEL device: a comparison with invasive measurements.
    Nakagomi A; Shoji T; Okada S; Ohno Y; Kobayashi Y
    Hypertens Res; 2018 Jan; 41(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28978987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device.
    Weiss W; Gohlisch C; Harsch-Gladisch C; Tölle M; Zidek W; van der Giet M
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 22561735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation Study to Determine the Accuracy of Central Blood Pressure Measurement Using the Sphygmocor Xcel Cuff Device.
    Schultz MG; Picone DS; Armstrong MK; Black JA; Dwyer N; Roberts-Thomson P; Sharman JE
    Hypertension; 2020 Jul; 76(1):244-250. PubMed ID: 32475318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the Vicorder, a novel cuff-based device for the noninvasive estimation of central blood pressure.
    Pucci G; Cheriyan J; Hubsch A; Hickson SS; Gajendragadkar PR; Watson T; O'Sullivan M; Woodcock-Smith J; Schillaci G; Wilkinson IB; McEniery CM
    J Hypertens; 2013 Jan; 31(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 23079681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Invasive validation of a novel brachial cuff-based oscillometric device (SphygmoCor XCEL) for measuring central blood pressure.
    Shoji T; Nakagomi A; Okada S; Ohno Y; Kobayashi Y
    J Hypertens; 2017 Jan; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 27763994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of central aortic pressure by SphygmoCor requires intra-arterial peripheral pressures.
    Cloud GC; Rajkumar C; Kooner J; Cooke J; Bulpitt CJ
    Clin Sci (Lond); 2003 Aug; 105(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 12710885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of a brachial cuff-based method for estimating central systolic blood pressure.
    Weber T; Wassertheurer S; Rammer M; Maurer E; Hametner B; Mayer CC; Kropf J; Eber B
    Hypertension; 2011 Nov; 58(5):825-32. PubMed ID: 21911710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arterial pressure: agreement between a brachial cuff-based device and radial tonometry.
    Park CM; Korolkova O; Davies JE; Parker KH; Siggers JH; March K; Tillin T; Chaturvedi N; Hughes AD
    J Hypertens; 2014 Apr; 32(4):865-72. PubMed ID: 24379000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of oscillometric aortic pressure and stiffness assessment using the VaSera VS-1500: comparison with a common tonometric method.
    Endes S; Bachler M; Li Y; Mayer C; Hanssen H; Hametner B; Schmidt-Trucksäss A; Wassertheurer S
    Blood Press Monit; 2015 Oct; 20(5):273-9. PubMed ID: 26065840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of non-invasive calibration of radial waveforms on error in transfer-function-derived central aortic waveform characteristics.
    Hope SA; Meredith IT; Cameron JD
    Clin Sci (Lond); 2004 Aug; 107(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 15139848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Continuous Non-invasive finger cuff CareTaker® comparable to invasive intra-arterial pressure in patients undergoing major intra-abdominal surgery.
    Gratz I; Deal E; Spitz F; Baruch M; Allen IE; Seaman JE; Pukenas E; Jean S
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):48. PubMed ID: 28327093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of central SBP in children estimated from a brachial cuff alone, brachial cuff-calibrated applanation radial tonometry and brachial cuff-calibrated carotid wall-tracking.
    Rajalingam S; Milne L; Keehn L; Chowienczyk P; Sinha MD
    J Hypertens; 2019 Dec; 37(12):2422-2429. PubMed ID: 31246890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cuff and aortic pressure differences during dobutamine infusion: a study of the effects of systolic blood pressure amplification.
    Smulyan H; Mukherjee R; Sheehe PR; Safar ME
    Am Heart J; 2010 Mar; 159(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 20211301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of central blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: a comparison between SphygmoCor and invasively measured values.
    Laugesen E; Rossen NB; Peters CD; Mæng M; Ebbehøj E; Knudsen ST; Hansen KW; Bøtker HE; Poulsen PL
    Am J Hypertens; 2014 Feb; 27(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 24304654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.