These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23366487)

  • 1. Statistical error detection for clinical laboratory tests.
    Leen TK; Erdogmus D; Kazmierczak S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():2720-3. PubMed ID: 23366487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finish before the start: Analyzing preanalytical sample errors in a tertiary care hematology laboratory.
    Gaur K; Puri V; Shukla S; Sharma S; Suman S; Singh R
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2020; 63(3):435-440. PubMed ID: 32769334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality control of laboratory results in real time.
    Picco W; Pinna Pintor L; Baruzzo G; Pistono O; Triumbari F; Pinna Pintor P
    Qual Assur Health Care; 1992 Mar; 4(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 1576336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Innovative software for recording preanalytical errors in accord with the IFCC quality indicators.
    Lippi G; Sciacovelli L; Simundic AM; Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 55(3):e51-e53. PubMed ID: 28125403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Errors in laboratory medicine and patient safety. Foreword.
    Plebani M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jun; 404(1):1. PubMed ID: 19298802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reducing preanalytical laboratory sample errors through educational and technological interventions.
    Lillo R; Salinas M; Lopez-Garrigos M; Naranjo-Santana Y; Gutiérrez M; Marín MD; Miralles M; Uris J
    Clin Lab; 2012; 58(9-10):911-7. PubMed ID: 23163106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Specimen labelling: A complex process with a high error rate].
    Frank O; Kerker-Specker C
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Sep; 135-136():10-17. PubMed ID: 30120032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Preventive screening in two factories. II. Exactitude of laboratory tests and questionnaire (author's transl)].
    Rommel K; Steinhardt B; Uberla K
    Klin Wochenschr; 1976 Dec; 54(24):1177-85. PubMed ID: 1003876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Laboratory errors – why the laboratory is not (always) to blame].
    Savoca R
    Ther Umsch; 2015 Feb; 72(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 25630293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The incorrect laboratory result. Part 1: Pre- and postanalytical phase].
    Fiedler GM; Thiery J
    Internist (Berl); 2004 Mar; 45(3):315-29; quiz 330. PubMed ID: 15074319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards a new paradigm in laboratory medicine: the five rights.
    Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2016 Dec; 54(12):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 27732557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncertainty in Measurement and Total Error: Tools for Coping with Diagnostic Uncertainty.
    Theodorsson E
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 28153362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic assessment of culture review as a tool to assess errors in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Goodyear N; Ulness BK; Prentice JL; Cookson BT; Limaye AP
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Nov; 132(11):1792-5. PubMed ID: 18976017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reduction of preanalytical errors in laboratory by establishment and application of training system.
    Ying Li H; Yang YC; Huang WF; Li YF; Song P; Chen L; Lan Y
    J Evid Based Med; 2014 Dec; 7(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 25586456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Errors in laboratory medicine.
    Bonini P; Plebani M; Ceriotti F; Rubboli F
    Clin Chem; 2002 May; 48(5):691-8. PubMed ID: 11978595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determining the utility of creatinine delta checks: A large retrospective analysis.
    Gruenberg JM; Stein TA; Karger AB
    Clin Biochem; 2018 Mar; 53():139-142. PubMed ID: 29402415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [ESTIMATE OF THE INTRINSIC ERROR OF THE MEASURING INSTRUMENT OF THE LABORATORY FOR ANALYTICAL DETERMINATIONS OF THE CRITICAL PATIENT].
    Tineo Drove T; Santos Ampuero MÁ; Díaz López A; Rodríguez Salvanés F; Vega Piris L; Gómez Puyuelo M
    Rev Enferm; 2016 May; 39(5):26-31. PubMed ID: 27405144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sigma Metrics Across the Total Testing Process.
    Charuruks N
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):97-117. PubMed ID: 28153373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic error as a result of drug-laboratory test interactions.
    van Balveren JA; Verboeket-van de Venne WPHG; Erdem-Eraslan L; de Graaf AJ; Loot AE; Musson REA; Oosterhuis WP; Schuijt MP; van der Sijs H; Verheul RJ; de Wolf HK; Kusters R; Hoedemakers RMJ;
    Diagnosis (Berl); 2019 Mar; 6(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 30753158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A system dynamics approach to analyze laboratory test errors.
    Guo S; Roudsari A; Garcez Ad
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():266-70. PubMed ID: 25991147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.