These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23366847)

  • 21. IMU-Based Wrist Rotation Control of a Transradial Myoelectric Prosthesis.
    Bennett DA; Goldfarb M
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2018 Feb; 26(2):419-427. PubMed ID: 28320673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Brain activation during manipulation of the myoelectric prosthetic hand: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Maruishi M; Tanaka Y; Muranaka H; Tsuji T; Ozawa Y; Imaizumi S; Miyatani M; Kawahara J
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1604-11. PubMed ID: 15050584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Locomotor Adaptation by Transtibial Amputees Walking With an Experimental Powered Prosthesis Under Continuous Myoelectric Control.
    Huang S; Wensman JP; Ferris DP
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 May; 24(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 26057851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A haptic knob for rehabilitation of hand function.
    Lambercy O; Dovat L; Gassert R; Burdet E; Teo CL; Milner T
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Sep; 15(3):356-66. PubMed ID: 17894268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Vibrotactile sensory substitution for electromyographic control of object manipulation.
    Rombokas E; Stepp CE; Chang C; Malhotra M; Matsuoka Y
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Aug; 60(8):2226-32. PubMed ID: 23508245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. AsTeRICS.
    Drajsajtl T; Struk P; Bednárová A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 189():179-86. PubMed ID: 23739379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. GLIMPSE: Google Glass interface for sensory feedback in myoelectric hand prostheses.
    Markovic M; Karnal H; Graimann B; Farina D; Dosen S
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Jun; 14(3):036007. PubMed ID: 28355147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Learning from demonstration: Teaching a myoelectric prosthesis with an intact limb via reinforcement learning.
    Vasan G; Pilarski PM
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1457-1464. PubMed ID: 28814025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Non-Invasive, Temporally Discrete Feedback of Object Contact and Release Improves Grasp Control of Closed-Loop Myoelectric Transradial Prostheses.
    Clemente F; D'Alonzo M; Controzzi M; Edin BB; Cipriani C
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Dec; 24(12):1314-1322. PubMed ID: 26584497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. RUPERT closed loop control design.
    Balasubramanian S; Wei R; He J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3467-70. PubMed ID: 19163455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Neuro-physical rehabilitation by means of novel touch technologies.
    Confalonieri M; Tomasi P; Depaul M; Guandalini G; Baldessari M; Oss D; Prada F; Mazzalai A; Da Lio M; De Cecco M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 189():158-63. PubMed ID: 23739376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Real-time myoelectric control of a multi-fingered hand prosthesis using principal components analysis.
    Matrone GC; Cipriani C; Carrozza MC; Magenes G
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2012 Jun; 9():40. PubMed ID: 22703711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Grasp specific and user friendly interface design for myoelectric hand prostheses.
    Mohammadi A; Lavranos J; Howe R; Choong P; Oetomo D
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1621-1626. PubMed ID: 28814052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Supervisory controller design for a robot-assisted reach-to-grasp rehabilitation task.
    Wang F; Sarkar N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4258-61. PubMed ID: 19163653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Control of upper limb prostheses: terminology and proportional myoelectric control-a review.
    Fougner A; Stavdahl O; Kyberd PJ; Losier YG; Parker PA
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2012 Sep; 20(5):663-77. PubMed ID: 22665514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A special purpose embedded system for neural machine interface for artificial legs.
    Zhang X; Huang H; Yang Q
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():5207-10. PubMed ID: 22255511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A portable rehabilitation device for the Hand.
    Iqbal J; Tsagarakis NG; Fiorilla AE; Caldwell DG
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3694-7. PubMed ID: 21096857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Virtual Reality environment assisting post stroke hand rehabilitation: case report.
    Tsoupikova D; Stoykov N; Kamper D; Vick R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 184():458-64. PubMed ID: 23400202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis.
    Dosen S; Markovic M; Somer K; Graimann B; Farina D
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 12():55. PubMed ID: 26088323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Deep learning-based artificial vision for grasp classification in myoelectric hands.
    Ghazaei G; Alameer A; Degenaar P; Morgan G; Nazarpour K
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Jun; 14(3):036025. PubMed ID: 28467317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.