139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23366898)
1. Medical image restoration with different types of noise.
Sánchez MG; Vidal V; Verdú G; Mayo P; Rodenas F
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4382-5. PubMed ID: 23366898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of architectural distortion in mammograms.
Ayres FJ; Rangayyan RM
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2005; 24(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 15709538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A minimum spanning forest based classification method for dedicated breast CT images.
Pike R; Sechopoulos I; Fei B
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6190-202. PubMed ID: 26520712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
Singh S; Bovis K
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of enhancement methods for mammograms with performance measures.
Kurt B; Nabiyev VV; Turhan K
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():486-90. PubMed ID: 25160232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wavelet-based noise-model driven denoising algorithm for differential phase contrast mammography.
Arboleda C; Wang Z; Stampanoni M
Opt Express; 2013 May; 21(9):10572-89. PubMed ID: 23669913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diffusion equations with negentropy applied to denoise mammographic images.
Mayo P; Rodenas F; Ginestar D; Verdú G; Miró R
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():4751-4. PubMed ID: 17946261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technique for preprocessing of digital mammogram.
Maitra IK; Nag S; Bandyopadhyay SK
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Aug; 107(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 21669471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Linearization of mammograms using parameters derived from noise characteristics.
Karssemeijer N; Snoeren PR; Zhang W
Inf Process Med Imaging; 2005; 19():258-69. PubMed ID: 17354701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images.
Oliver A; Freixenet J; Martí J; Pérez E; Pont J; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
Med Image Anal; 2010 Apr; 14(2):87-110. PubMed ID: 20071209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of breast tissue classification techniques.
Oliver A; Freixenet J; Martí R; Zwiggelaar R
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):872-9. PubMed ID: 17354855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adaptation of a clustered lumpy background model for task-based image quality assessment in x-ray phase-contrast mammography.
Zysk AM; Brankov JG; Wernick MN; Anastasio MA
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):906-11. PubMed ID: 22320800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detecting microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet domain hidden Markov tree model.
Regentova E; Zhang L; Zheng J; Veni G
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1972-5. PubMed ID: 17945686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of difference of Gaussian filters in the detection of mammographic regions.
Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4104-14. PubMed ID: 17153390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Wavelet-packet-based approach for breast cancer classification.
Torabi M; Razavian SM; Vaziri R; Vosoughi-Vahdat B
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():5100-3. PubMed ID: 22255486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-scale textural feature extraction and particle swarm optimization based model selection for false positive reduction in mammography.
Zyout I; Czajkowska J; Grzegorzek M
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():95-107. PubMed ID: 25795630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
Kus P; Karagoz I
Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A probabilistic framework for image information fusion with an application to mammographic analysis.
Velikova M; Lucas PJ; Samulski M; Karssemeijer N
Med Image Anal; 2012 May; 16(4):865-75. PubMed ID: 22326491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
