These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23366898)

  • 21. Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population.
    Vedantham S; Shi L; Karellas A; O'Connell AM
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7317-28. PubMed ID: 23231281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Shape analysis of microcalcifications using Radon transform.
    Bocchi L; Nori J
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jul; 29(6):691-8. PubMed ID: 17081794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantifying effect-specific mammographic density.
    Raundahl J; Loog M; Pettersen P; Nielsen M
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 2):580-7. PubMed ID: 18044615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Region-based wavelet coding methods for digital mammography.
    Penedo M; Pearlman WA; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Oct; 22(10):1288-96. PubMed ID: 14552582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pectoral muscle detection in mammograms based on the shortest path with endpoints learnt by SVMs.
    Domingues I; Cardoso JS; Amaral I; Moreira I; Passarinho P; Santa Comba J; Correia R; Cardoso MJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3158-61. PubMed ID: 21096595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. False positive reduction in mammographic mass detection using local binary patterns.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí J
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):286-93. PubMed ID: 18051070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Markov random field-based clustering applied to the segmentation of masses in digital mammograms.
    Suliga M; Deklerck R; Nyssen E
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Sep; 32(6):502-12. PubMed ID: 18620842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The use of a priori information in the detection of mammographic microcalcifications to improve their classification.
    Salfity MF; Nishikawa RM; Jiang Y; Papaioannou J
    Med Phys; 2003 May; 30(5):823-31. PubMed ID: 12772990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers.
    Sadaf A; Crystal P; Scaranelo A; Helbich T
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Breast cancer detection and classification in digital mammography based on Non-Subsampled Contourlet Transform (NSCT) and Super Resolution.
    Pak F; Kanan HR; Alikhassi A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Nov; 122(2):89-107. PubMed ID: 26206406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Investigation of reading mode and relative sensitivity as factors that influence reader performance when using computer-aided detection software.
    Paquerault S; Samuelson FW; Petrick N; Myers KJ; Smith RC
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1095-107. PubMed ID: 19523855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hybrid cosine and Radon transform-based processing for digital mammogram feature extraction and classification with SVM.
    Lahmiri S; Boukadoum M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():5104-7. PubMed ID: 22255487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automatic detection of anomalies in screening mammograms.
    Kendall EJ; Barnett MG; Chytyk-Praznik K
    BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Dec; 13():43. PubMed ID: 24330643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mass auto-detection in mammogram based on wavelet transform modulus maximum.
    Ke L; He W; Kang Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():5760-3. PubMed ID: 19963653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A wavelet-based spatially adaptive method for mammographic contrast enhancement.
    Sakellaropoulos P; Costaridou L; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Mar; 48(6):787-803. PubMed ID: 12699195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microcalcification detection based on wavelet domain hidden markov tree model: study for inclusion to computer aided diagnostic prompting system.
    Regentova E; Zhang L; Zheng J; Veni G
    Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):2206-19. PubMed ID: 17654922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. SVM and neural networks comparison in mammographic CAD.
    García-Orellana CJ; Gallardo-Caballero R; Macías-Macias M; González-Velasco H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3204-7. PubMed ID: 18002677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
    Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.
    Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Elmaghraby AS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):880-9. PubMed ID: 17679338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automatic detection of microcalcifications with multi-fractal spectrum.
    Ding Y; Dai H; Zhang H
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3049-54. PubMed ID: 25227013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.