These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23366901)

  • 21. A regional registration method to find corresponding mass lesions in temporal mammogram pairs.
    Timp S; van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2629-38. PubMed ID: 16193793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast masses in mammography: combined detection and ensemble classification.
    Choi JY; Kim DH; Plataniotis KN; Ro YM
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 59(14):3697-719. PubMed ID: 24923292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bilateral analysis based false positive reduction for computer-aided mass detection.
    Wu YT; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Zhou C; Ge J; Shi J; Zhang Y; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3334-44. PubMed ID: 17879797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Temporal change analysis for characterization of mass lesions in mammography.
    Timp S; Varela C; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jul; 26(7):945-53. PubMed ID: 17649908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Matching breast masses depicted on different views a comparison of three methods.
    Zheng B; Tan J; Ganott MA; Chough DM; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1338-47. PubMed ID: 19632867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of information-theoretic similarity measures for content-based retrieval and detection of masses in mammograms.
    Tourassi GD; Harrawood B; Singh S; Lo JY; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 17278499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detecting microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet domain hidden Markov tree model.
    Regentova E; Zhang L; Zheng J; Veni G
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1972-5. PubMed ID: 17945686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computer aided detection system for micro calcifications in digital mammograms.
    Mohamed H; Mabrouk MS; Sharawy A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Oct; 116(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 24909786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identification of the breast edge using areas enclosed by iso-intensity contours.
    Padayachee J; Alport MJ; Rae WI
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Sep; 31(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 17398069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volumes with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammograms.
    van Schie G; Wallis MG; Leifland K; Danielsson M; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041902. PubMed ID: 23556896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Microcalcification detection based on wavelet domain hidden markov tree model: study for inclusion to computer aided diagnostic prompting system.
    Regentova E; Zhang L; Zheng J; Veni G
    Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):2206-19. PubMed ID: 17654922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.
    Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An evaluation and comparison of the performance of state of the art approaches for the detection of spiculated masses in mammograms.
    Kage A; Elter M; Wittenberg T
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3773-6. PubMed ID: 18002819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tolerance to missing data using a likelihood ratio based classifier for computer-aided classification of breast cancer.
    Bilska-Wolak AO; Floyd CE
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(18):4219-37. PubMed ID: 15509062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Towards optimized acquisition scheme for multiprojection correlation imaging of breast cancer.
    Chawla AS; Saunders RS; Singh S; Lo JY; Samei E
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):456-63. PubMed ID: 19268858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The performance of computer-aided detection when analyzing prior mammograms of newly detected breast cancers with special focus on the time interval from initial imaging to detection.
    Malich A; Schmidt S; Fischer DR; Facius M; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):574-8. PubMed ID: 18337045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On the comparison of FROC curves in mammography CAD systems.
    Bornefalk H; Hermansson AB
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):412-7. PubMed ID: 15789587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantifying effect-specific mammographic density.
    Raundahl J; Loog M; Pettersen P; Nielsen M
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 2):580-7. PubMed ID: 18044615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.