These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23367134)

  • 1. Automated and robust PERCIST-based thresholding framework for whole body PET-CT studies.
    Bi L; Kim J; Wen L; Feng DD
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():5335-8. PubMed ID: 23367134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Usefulness of standardized uptake value normalized by individual CT-based lean body mass in application of PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST).
    Narita A; Shiomi S; Katayama Y; Yamanaga T; Daisaki H; Hamada K; Watanabe Y
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2016 Jul; 9(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 26873140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated measurement of uptake in cerebellum, liver, and aortic arch in full-body FDG PET/CT scans.
    Bauer C; Sun S; Sun W; Otis J; Wallace A; Smith BJ; Sunderland JJ; Graham MM; Sonka M; Buatti JM; Beichel RR
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3112-23. PubMed ID: 22755696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated localization and segmentation of lung tumor from PET-CT thorax volumes based on image feature analysis.
    Cui H; Wang X; Feng D
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():5384-7. PubMed ID: 23367146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A semi-automated technique determining the liver standardized uptake value reference for tumor delineation in FDG PET-CT.
    Hirata K; Kobayashi K; Wong KP; Manabe O; Surmak A; Tamaki N; Huang SC
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e105682. PubMed ID: 25162396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computerized method for automatic evaluation of lean body mass from PET/CT: comparison with predictive equations.
    Chan T
    J Nucl Med; 2012 Jan; 53(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 22128325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of manual and automated approaches for segmentation and extraction of quantitative indices from [
    Krokos G; Kotwal T; Malaih A; Barrington S; Jackson P; Hicks RJ; Marsden PK; Fischer BM
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 Jan; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 38100790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A method for evaluation of patient-specific lean body mass from limited-coverage CT images and its application in PERCIST: comparison with predictive equation.
    Shang J; Tan Z; Cheng Y; Tang Y; Guo B; Gong J; Ling X; Wang L; Xu H
    EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Feb; 8(1):12. PubMed ID: 33555478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positron emission tomography image thresholding.
    Erdi YE; Mawlawi O; Larson SM; Imbriaco M; Yeung H; Finn R; Humm JL
    Cancer; 1997 Dec; 80(12 Suppl):2505-9. PubMed ID: 9406703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Positron Emission Tomography Quantification Using Magnetic Resonance- and Computed Tomography-Based Attenuation Correction in Physiological Tissues and Lesions: A Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Study in 66 Patients.
    Seith F; Gatidis S; Schmidt H; Bezrukov I; la Fougère C; Nikolaou K; Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer N
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Jan; 51(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26348596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of simplified dosimetry approaches in ⁸⁹Zr-PET/CT: the use of manual versus semi-automatic delineation methods to estimate organ absorbed doses.
    Makris NE; van Velden FH; Huisman MC; Menke CW; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
    Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):102503. PubMed ID: 25281978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of PET/CT image reconstruction methods and liver uptake normalization strategies on quantitative image analysis.
    Kuhnert G; Boellaard R; Sterzer S; Kahraman D; Scheffler M; Wolf J; Dietlein M; Drzezga A; Kobe C
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):249-258. PubMed ID: 26280981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lean body mass correction of standardized uptake value in simultaneous whole-body positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Jochimsen TH; Schulz J; Busse H; Werner P; Schaudinn A; Zeisig V; Kurch L; Seese A; Barthel H; Sattler B; Sabri O
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 60(12):4651-64. PubMed ID: 26020722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Twelve automated thresholding methods for segmentation of PET images: a phantom study.
    Prieto E; Lecumberri P; Pagola M; Gómez M; Bilbao I; Ecay M; Peñuelas I; Martí-Climent JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):3963-80. PubMed ID: 22647928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic liver detection and standardised uptake value evaluation in whole-body Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography scans.
    Chauvie S; Bertone E; Bergesio F; Terulla A; Botto D; Cerello P
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():47-52. PubMed ID: 29428075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repeatability of Quantitative Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake Measures as Function of Uptake Interval and Lesion Selection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.
    Kramer GM; Frings V; Hoetjes N; Hoekstra OS; Smit EF; de Langen AJ; Boellaard R
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1343-9. PubMed ID: 27103020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST for PET/CT response evaluation of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab.
    Skougaard K; Nielsen D; Jensen BV; Hendel HW
    J Nucl Med; 2013 Jul; 54(7):1026-31. PubMed ID: 23572497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using positron emission tomography (PET) response criteria in solid tumours (PERCIST) 1.0 for evaluation of 2'-deoxy-2'-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose-PET/CT scans to predict survival early during treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    Fledelius J; Khalil AA; Hjorthaug K; Frøkiaer J
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 60(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 26678718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT: interreader agreement and impact of placement of volume of interest.
    Viner M; Mercier G; Hao F; Malladi A; Subramaniam RM
    Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):596-601. PubMed ID: 23297330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.