These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23367148)

  • 1. Overlapped chromosome segmentation and separation of touching chromosome for automated chromosome classification.
    Madian N; Jayanthi KB
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():5392-5. PubMed ID: 23367148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mathematical approach for segmenting chromosome clusters in metaspread images.
    Devaraj S; Madian N; Suresh S
    Exp Cell Res; 2022 Sep; 418(1):113251. PubMed ID: 35691379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced Rotated Mask R-CNN for Chromosome Segmentation.
    Wang P; Hu W; Zhang J; Wen Y; Xu C; Qian D
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():2769-2772. PubMed ID: 34891823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel approach for efficient extrication of overlapping chromosomes in automated karyotyping.
    Munot MV; Mukherjee J; Joshi M
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2013 Dec; 51(12):1325-38. PubMed ID: 23959611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A review of metaphase chromosome image selection techniques for automatic karyotype generation.
    Arora T; Dhir R
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Aug; 54(8):1147-57. PubMed ID: 26676686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Athena semi-automated karyotyping system.
    van Vliet LJ; Young IT; Mayall BH
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 2307062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic karyotyping of metaphase cells with overlapping chromosomes.
    Popescu M; Gader P; Keller J; Klein C; Stanley J; Caldwell C
    Comput Biol Med; 1999 Jan; 29(1):61-82. PubMed ID: 10207655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated analysis of karyotype images.
    Khazaei E; Emrany A; Tavassolipour M; Mahjoubi F; Ebrahimi A; Motahari SA
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2022 Jun; 20(3):2250011. PubMed ID: 35802463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PIXEL SENSIBLE LOCAL BAND ANALYSIS IN MICROSCOPIC CHROMOSOME IMAGES USING CSPA.
    Somasundaram D
    Tsitol Genet; 2016; 50(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 27266185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhancement of the classification of multichannel chromosome images using support vector machines.
    Karvelis PS; Fotiadis DI; Georgiou I; Sakaloglou P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3601-4. PubMed ID: 19964307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chromosome Segmentation via Data Simulation and Shape Learning.
    Chen P; Cai J; Yang L
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():1637-1640. PubMed ID: 33018309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automatic segmentation and disentangling of chromosomes in Q-band prometaphase images.
    Grisan E; Poletti E; Ruggeri A
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 Jul; 13(4):575-81. PubMed ID: 19193514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximum-likelihood decomposition of overlapping and touching M-FISH chromosomes using geometry, size and color information.
    Choi H; Bovik AC; Castleman KR
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():3130-3. PubMed ID: 17946551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data-driven homologue matching for chromosome identification.
    Stanley RJ; Keller JM; Gader P; Caldwell CW
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Jun; 17(3):451-62. PubMed ID: 9735908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of image manipulation on automated karyotyping.
    Stanley RJ; Caldwell CW; Keller J; Gader P
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 33():305-10. PubMed ID: 9731376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated chromosome classification limitations due to image processing.
    Stanley R; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1995; 31():183-8. PubMed ID: 7654959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Clinical Dataset and Various Baselines for Chromosome Instance Segmentation.
    Huang R; Lin C; Yin A; Chen H; Guo L; Zhao G; Fan X; Li S; Yang J
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2022; 19(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 34133283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fully automatic chromosome segmentation.
    Ji L
    Cytometry; 1994 Nov; 17(3):196-208. PubMed ID: 7851156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A technique for multiple-cell chromosome karyotyping.
    Granlund GH; Zack GW; Young IT; Eden M
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1976 Jan; 24(1):160-7. PubMed ID: 1254914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Homologue matching using the Choquet integral.
    Stanley RJ; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 34():315-20. PubMed ID: 9603059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.