182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23367170)
1. Identification of the glucose minimal model by stochastic nonlinear-mixed effects methods.
Largajolli A; Bertoldo A; Cobelli C
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():5482-5. PubMed ID: 23367170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Nonmem 7.2 estimation methods and parallel processing efficiency on a target-mediated drug disposition model.
Gibiansky L; Gibiansky E; Bauer R
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2012 Feb; 39(1):17-35. PubMed ID: 22101761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance comparison of first-order conditional estimation with interaction and Bayesian estimation methods for estimating the population parameters and its distribution from data sets with a low number of subjects.
Pradhan S; Song B; Lee J; Chae JW; Kim KI; Back HM; Han N; Kwon KI; Yun HY
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):154. PubMed ID: 29191177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonlinear mixed effects to improve glucose minimal model parameter estimation: a simulation study in intensive and sparse sampling.
Denti P; Bertoldo A; Vicini P; Cobelli C
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Sep; 56(9):2156-66. PubMed ID: 19380266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extension of the SAEM algorithm for nonlinear mixed models with 2 levels of random effects.
Panhard X; Samson A
Biostatistics; 2009 Jan; 10(1):121-35. PubMed ID: 18583352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the performance of first-order conditional estimation (FOCE) and different expectation-maximization (EM) methods in NONMEM: real data experience with complex nonlinear parent-metabolite pharmacokinetic model.
Bach T; An G
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2021 Aug; 48(4):581-595. PubMed ID: 33884580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification of IVGTT minimal glucose model by nonlinear mixed-effects approaches.
Denti P; Bertoldo A; Vicini P; Cobelli C
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():5049-52. PubMed ID: 17947129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fisher information matrix for nonlinear mixed effects multiple response models: evaluation of the appropriateness of the first order linearization using a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.
Bazzoli C; Retout S; Mentré F
Stat Med; 2009 Jun; 28(14):1940-56. PubMed ID: 19266541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Population and individual minimal modeling of the frequently sampled insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test.
Erichsen L; Agbaje OF; Luzio SD; Owens DR; Hovorka R
Metabolism; 2004 Oct; 53(10):1349-54. PubMed ID: 15375793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the performance of FOCE and different expectation-maximization methods in handling complex population physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models.
Liu X; Wang Y
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Aug; 43(4):359-70. PubMed ID: 27215925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters of saquinavir in HIV patients with the MONOLIX software.
Lavielle M; Mentré F
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2007 Apr; 34(2):229-49. PubMed ID: 17211713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exact Gradients Improve Parameter Estimation in Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models with Stochastic Dynamics.
Olafsdottir HK; Leander J; Almquist J; Jirstrand M
AAPS J; 2018 Aug; 20(5):88. PubMed ID: 30069613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of FOCEI and SAEM Estimation Methods in Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis Using NONMEM
Sukarnjanaset W; Wattanavijitkul T; Jarurattanasirikul S
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 2018 Dec; 43(6):729-736. PubMed ID: 29785609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic analysis of growth curves using the SAEM algorithm.
Jaffrézic F; Meza C; Lavielle M; Foulley JL
Genet Sel Evol; 2006; 38(6):583-600. PubMed ID: 17129561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance in population models for count data, part II: a new SAEM algorithm.
Savic R; Lavielle M
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2009 Aug; 36(4):367-79. PubMed ID: 19680795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of Monte Carlo-based Bayesian parameter estimation methods for stochastic models of genetic networks.
Mariño IP; Zaikin A; Míguez J
PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182015. PubMed ID: 28797087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effects of multiple-trough sampling design and algorithm on the estimation of population and individual pharmacokinetic parameters].
Ling J; Qian LX; Ding JJ; Jiao Z
Yao Xue Xue Bao; 2014 May; 49(5):686-94. PubMed ID: 25151742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of uncertainty parameters estimated by different population PK software and methods.
Dartois C; Lemenuel-Diot A; Laveille C; Tranchand B; Tod M; Girard P
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2007 Jun; 34(3):289-311. PubMed ID: 17216368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the nonparametric estimation method in NONMEM VI.
Savic RM; Kjellsson MC; Karlsson MO
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2009 Apr; 37(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 19159684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
