134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23367178)
1. Investigation of the electric field components of tDCS via anisotropically conductive gyri-specific finite element head models.
Metwally MK; Cho YS; Park HJ; Kim TS
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():5514-7. PubMed ID: 23367178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of tissue anisotropy on the radial and tangential components of the electric field in transcranial direct current stimulation.
Metwally MK; Han SM; Kim TS
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Oct; 53(10):1085-101. PubMed ID: 25940845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of anisotropic conductivity in the skull and white matter on transcranial direct current stimulation via an anatomically realistic finite element head model.
Suh HS; Lee WH; Kim TS
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6961-80. PubMed ID: 23044667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients after decompressive craniectomy: a finite element model to investigate factors affecting the cortical electric field.
Sun W; Dong X; Yu G; Shuai L; Yuan Y; Ma C
J Int Med Res; 2021 Feb; 49(2):300060520942112. PubMed ID: 33788619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reduced spatial focality of electrical field in tDCS with ring electrodes due to tissue anisotropy.
Suh HS; Lee WH; Cho YS; Kim JH; Kim TS
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2053-6. PubMed ID: 21096150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad.
Datta A; Bansal V; Diaz J; Patel J; Reato D; Bikson M
Brain Stimul; 2009 Oct; 2(4):201-7, 207.e1. PubMed ID: 20648973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-resolution head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: A labeling analysis.
Thomas C; Huang Y; Faria PC; Datta A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():6442-6445. PubMed ID: 31947317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost of focality in TDCS: Interindividual variability in electric fields.
Mikkonen M; Laakso I; Tanaka S; Hirata A
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 31606449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of electric field distribution in anisotropic cortical and subcortical regions under the influence of tDCS.
Shahid S; Wen P; Ahfock T
Bioelectromagnetics; 2014 Jan; 35(1):41-57. PubMed ID: 24122951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Numerical investigation of white matter anisotropic conductivity in defining current distribution under tDCS.
Shahid S; Wen P; Ahfock T
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Jan; 109(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 23040278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigation of tDCS volume conduction effects in a highly realistic head model.
Wagner S; Rampersad SM; Aydin Ü; Vorwerk J; Oostendorp TF; Neuling T; Herrmann CS; Stegeman DF; Wolters CH
J Neural Eng; 2014 Feb; 11(1):016002. PubMed ID: 24310982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of Computational Modeling to Inform tDCS Electrode Montages for the Promotion of Language Recovery in Post-stroke Aphasia.
Galletta EE; Cancelli A; Cottone C; Simonelli I; Tecchio F; Bikson M; Marangolo P
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(6):1108-15. PubMed ID: 26198364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Realistic simulation of transcranial direct current stimulation via 3-d high-resolution finite element analysis: Effect of tissue anisotropy.
Suh HS; Kim SH; Lee WH; Kim TS
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():638-41. PubMed ID: 19964234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How does the electric field induced by tDCS influence motor-related connectivity? Model-guided perspectives.
Fernandes SR; Callejón-Leblic MA; Ferreira HA
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 69(5):. PubMed ID: 38266295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design of NIRS Probe Based on Computational Model to Find Out the Optimal Location for Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation.
Sharma G; Roy Chowdhury S
J Med Syst; 2018 Oct; 42(12):244. PubMed ID: 30374669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigating the cortical regions involved in MEP modulation in tDCS.
Salvador R; Wenger C; Miranda PC
Front Cell Neurosci; 2015; 9():405. PubMed ID: 26528134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Computational Analysis of the Electric Field Components in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Callejon-Leblic MA; Miranda PC
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5913-5917. PubMed ID: 31947195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling transcranial DC stimulation.
Oostendorp TF; Hengeveld YA; Wolters CH; Stinstra J; van Elswijk G; Stegeman DF
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4226-9. PubMed ID: 19163645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of montages and electric currents in tDCS.
Khorrampanah M; Seyedarabi H; Daneshvar S; Farhoudi M
Comput Biol Med; 2020 Oct; 125():103998. PubMed ID: 33039799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]