These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23367440)

  • 1. Moving coil pressure algometer produces consistent force gradient and repeated stimulation.
    Adnadjevic D; Graven-Nielsen T
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():6591-4. PubMed ID: 23367440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and validity of a pressure algometer.
    Kinser AM; Sands WA; Stone MH
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Jan; 23(1):312-4. PubMed ID: 19130648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of CPM reliability: quantification of the within-subject reliability of 10 different protocols.
    Vaegter HB; Petersen KK; Mørch CD; Imai Y; Arendt-Nielsen L
    Scand J Pain; 2018 Oct; 18(4):729-737. PubMed ID: 30007061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-controlled pneumatic pressure algometry--a new technique for quantitative sensory testing.
    Polianskis R; Graven-Nielsen T; Arendt-Nielsen L
    Eur J Pain; 2001; 5(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 11558982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vibration and rotation during biaxial pressure algometry is related with decreased and increased pain sensations.
    Adnadjevic D; Graven-Nielsen T
    Pain Med; 2014 Dec; 15(12):2095-104. PubMed ID: 25220654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety system for moving coil pressure algometer.
    Adnadjevic D; Lorrain T; Graven-Nielsen T
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():5356-9. PubMed ID: 24110946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Measuring pressure pain thresholds. Comparison of an electromechanically controlled algometer with established methods].
    Dagtekin O; König E; Gerbershagen HJ; Marcus H; Sabatowski R; Petzke F
    Schmerz; 2007 Oct; 21(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 17497183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interrater reliability of algometry in measuring pressure pain thresholds in healthy humans, using multiple raters.
    Chesterton LS; Sim J; Wright CC; Foster NE
    Clin J Pain; 2007; 23(9):760-6. PubMed ID: 18075402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Algometry with a clothes peg compared to an electronic pressure algometer: a randomized cross-sectional study in pain patients.
    Egloff N; Klingler N; von Känel R; Cámara RJ; Curatolo M; Wegmann B; Marti E; Ferrari ML
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2011 Jul; 12():174. PubMed ID: 21787399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability and validity of a new fingertip-shaped pressure algometer for assessing pressure pain thresholds in the temporomandibular joint and masticatory muscles.
    Bernhardt O; Schiffman EL; Look JO
    J Orofac Pain; 2007; 21(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 17312639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial and temporal aspects of deep tissue pain assessed by cuff algometry.
    Polianskis R; Graven-Nielsen T; Arendt-Nielsen L
    Pain; 2002 Nov; 100(1-2):19-26. PubMed ID: 12435455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sliding pressure algometer, a development in eliciting pressure pain thresholds at the boundaries of surface markings of abnormally tender regions.
    Macdonald AJ
    Acupunct Med; 2011 Jun; 29(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 21415048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of deep dynamic mechanical sensitivity in individuals with tension-type headache: The dynamic pressure algometry.
    Palacios-Ceña M; Wang K; Castaldo M; Guerrero-Peral Á; Caminero AB; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C; Arendt-Nielsen L
    Eur J Pain; 2017 Sep; 21(8):1451-1460. PubMed ID: 28573720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of modified adheremeter and digital pressure algometer in measuring normal abdominal tissue and C-section scars.
    Kelly-Martin R; Doughty L; Garkavi M; Wasserman JB
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2018 Oct; 22(4):972-979. PubMed ID: 30368344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deformation and pressure propagation in deep somatic tissue during painful cuff algometry.
    Manafi-Khanian B; Arendt-Nielsen L; Frøkjaer JB; Graven-Nielsen T
    Eur J Pain; 2015 Nov; 19(10):1456-66. PubMed ID: 25708907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Test-retest reliability, repeatability, and sensitivity of an automated deformation-controlled indentation on pressure pain threshold measurement.
    Koo TK; Guo JY; Brown CM
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2013 Feb; 36(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 23499143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interface Pressure Behavior During Painful Cuff Algometry.
    Manafi Khanian B; Arendt-Nielsen L; Kjær Petersen K; Samani A; Graven-Nielsen T
    Pain Med; 2016 May; 17(5):915-23. PubMed ID: 26759388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Relationship between Rate of Algometer Application and Pain Pressure Threshold in the Assessment of Myofascial Trigger Point Sensitivity.
    Linde LD; Kumbhare DA; Joshi M; Srbely JZ
    Pain Pract; 2018 Feb; 18(2):224-229. PubMed ID: 28440895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of repeatability of pressure algometry on the neck muscles for clinical use.
    Ylinen J; Nykänen M; Kautiainen H; Häkkinen A
    Man Ther; 2007 May; 12(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 16956783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test-retest reliability of subjective supra-threshold scaling of multiple pressure-pain sensations among healthy individuals: a study using hydraulic pressure algometry.
    Dissanayaka TD; Farrell M; Zoghi M; Egan GF; Jaberzadeh S
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2018; 35(3-4):153-161. PubMed ID: 30299201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.