These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23367479)

  • 1. A spatially-regularized dynamic source localization algorithm for EEG.
    Pirondini E; Babadi B; Lamus C; Brown EN; Purdon PL
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():6752-5. PubMed ID: 23367479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computationally Efficient Algorithms for Sparse, Dynamic Solutions to the EEG Source Localization Problem.
    Pirondini E; Babadi B; Obregon-Henao G; Lamus C; Malik WQ; Hamalainen MS; Purdon PL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Jun; 65(6):1359-1372. PubMed ID: 28920892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A fast iterative greedy algorithm for MEG source localization.
    Obregon-Henao G; Babadi B; Lamus C; Brown EN; Purdon PL
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():6748-51. PubMed ID: 23367478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation of EEG and MEG source imaging accuracy in reconstructing extended cortical sources.
    Ding L; Yuan H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():7013-6. PubMed ID: 22255953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Subspace Pursuit-based Iterative Greedy Hierarchical solution to the neuromagnetic inverse problem.
    Babadi B; Obregon-Henao G; Lamus C; Hämäläinen MS; Brown EN; Purdon PL
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():427-43. PubMed ID: 24055554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sparse weightings for collapsing inverse solutions to cortical parcellations optimize M/EEG source reconstruction accuracy.
    Korhonen O; Palva S; Palva JM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Apr; 226():147-160. PubMed ID: 24509129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Localization Estimation Algorithm (LEA): a supervised prior-based approach for solving the EEG/MEG inverse problem.
    Mattout J; Pélégrini-Issac M; Bellio A; Daunizeau J; Benali H
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():536-47. PubMed ID: 15344486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A three domain covariance framework for EEG/MEG data.
    Roś BP; Bijma F; de Gunst MC; de Munck JC
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 119():305-15. PubMed ID: 26072253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatio-temporal Reconstruction of Neural Sources Using Indirect Dominant Mode Rejection.
    Jafadideh AT; Asl BM
    Brain Topogr; 2018 Jul; 31(4):591-607. PubMed ID: 29704076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new wavelet transform to sparsely represent cortical current densities for EEG/MEG inverse problems.
    Liao K; Zhu M; Ding L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Aug; 111(2):376-88. PubMed ID: 23706527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. STRAPS: A Fully Data-Driven Spatio-Temporally Regularized Algorithm for M/EEG Patch Source Imaging.
    Liu K; Yu ZL; Wu W; Gu Z; Li Y
    Int J Neural Syst; 2015 Jun; 25(4):1550016. PubMed ID: 25903226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A resampling method for estimating the signal subspace of spatio-temporal EEG/MEG data.
    Maris E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Aug; 50(8):935-49. PubMed ID: 12892321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complex patterns of spatially extended generators of epileptic activity: Comparison of source localization methods cMEM and 4-ExSo-MUSIC on high resolution EEG and MEG data.
    Chowdhury RA; Merlet I; Birot G; Kobayashi E; Nica A; Biraben A; Wendling F; Lina JM; Albera L; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():175-195. PubMed ID: 27561712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatiotemporal noise covariance estimation from limited empirical magnetoencephalographic data.
    Jun SC; Plis SM; Ranken DM; Schmidt DM
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5549-64. PubMed ID: 17047269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A probabilistic algorithm integrating source localization and noise suppression for MEG and EEG data.
    Zumer JM; Attias HT; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(1):102-15. PubMed ID: 17574444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hierarchical multiscale Bayesian algorithm for robust MEG/EEG source reconstruction.
    Cai C; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():698-715. PubMed ID: 30059734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Solving the EEG inverse problem based on space-time-frequency structured sparsity constraints.
    Castaño-Candamil S; Höhne J; Martínez-Vargas JD; An XW; Castellanos-Domínguez G; Haufe S
    Neuroimage; 2015 Sep; 118():598-612. PubMed ID: 26048621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.