These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23367825)

  • 1. Gymnastic judges benefit from their own motor experience as gymnasts.
    Pizzera A
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2012 Dec; 83(4):603-7. PubMed ID: 23367825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gaze Behavior of Gymnastics Judges: Where Do Experienced Judges and Gymnasts Look While Judging?
    Pizzera A; Möller C; Plessner H
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2018 Mar; 89(1):112-119. PubMed ID: 29351508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expertise in women's gymnastic judging: an observational approach.
    Ste-Marie DM
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Apr; 90(2):543-6. PubMed ID: 10833752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Judging the judges' performance in rhythmic gymnastics.
    Flessas K; Mylonas D; Panagiotaropoulou G; Tsopani D; Korda A; Siettos C; Di Cagno A; Evdokimidis I; Smyrnis N
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Mar; 47(3):640-8. PubMed ID: 24977695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Knowledge of performance, skill level and performance on the balance beam.
    Selder DJ; Del Rolan N
    Can J Appl Sport Sci; 1979 Sep; 4(3):226-9. PubMed ID: 540418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Judgment of actions in experts: a high-resolution EEG study in elite athletes.
    Babiloni C; Del Percio C; Rossini PM; Marzano N; Iacoboni M; Infarinato F; Lizio R; Piazza M; Pirritano M; Berlutti G; Cibelli G; Eusebi F
    Neuroimage; 2009 Apr; 45(2):512-21. PubMed ID: 19111623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Posturographic testing and motor learning predictability in gymnasts.
    Carrick FR; Oggero E; Pagnacco G; Brock JB; Arikan T
    Disabil Rehabil; 2007 Dec; 29(24):1881-9. PubMed ID: 17852265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of angle of view on judges' evaluations of inverted cross in men's rings.
    Dallas G; Mavidis A; Chairopoulou C
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Feb; 112(1):109-21. PubMed ID: 21466084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The measurement of competitive anxiety during balance beam performance in gymnasts.
    Cottyn J; De Clercq D; Pannier JL; Crombez G; Lenoir M
    J Sports Sci; 2006 Feb; 24(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 16368625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional demand for regulating postural sway: the effect of expertise in gymnastics.
    Vuillerme N; Nougier V
    Brain Res Bull; 2004 Mar; 63(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 15130706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic recognition and scoring of olympic rhythmic gymnastic movements.
    Díaz-Pereira MP; Gómez-Conde I; Escalona M; Olivieri DN
    Hum Mov Sci; 2014 Apr; 34():63-80. PubMed ID: 24502991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of training and position on judges' ratings of a gymnastic event.
    Stephenson DA; Jackson AS
    Res Q; 1977 Mar; 48(1):177-80. PubMed ID: 266234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of experience on postural control: effect of expertise in gymnastics.
    Gautier G; Thouvarecq R; Larue J
    J Mot Behav; 2008 Sep; 40(5):400-8. PubMed ID: 18782715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The contribution of anthropometric characteristics to performance scores in elite female gymnasts.
    Claessens AL; Lefevre J; Beunen G; Malina RM
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 1999 Dec; 39(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 10726438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Open feedback in gymnastic judging causes conformity bias based on informational influencing.
    Boen F; van Hoye K; Auweele YV; Feys J; Smits T
    J Sports Sci; 2008 Apr; 26(6):621-8. PubMed ID: 18344133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Directionality in Aesthetic Judgments and Performance Evaluation: Sport Judges and Laypeople Compared.
    Loffing F; Nickel S; Hagemann N
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2109. PubMed ID: 29259568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brain anatomical networks in world class gymnasts: a DTI tractography study.
    Wang B; Fan Y; Lu M; Li S; Song Z; Peng X; Zhang R; Lin Q; He Y; Wang J; Huang R
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():476-87. PubMed ID: 23073234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of self-modeling on self-efficacy and balance beam performance.
    Winfrey ML; Weeks DL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Dec; 77(3 Pt 1):907-13. PubMed ID: 8284175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Specificity of learning and dynamic balance.
    Robertson S; Elliott D
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1996 Mar; 67(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 8735996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Level of gymnastic skill as an intrinsic constraint on postural coordination.
    Marin L; Bardy BG; Bootsma RJ
    J Sports Sci; 1999 Aug; 17(8):615-26. PubMed ID: 10487462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.