These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23368415)

  • 1. Rationality and the generalization of randomized controlled trial evidence.
    Fuller J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):644-7. PubMed ID: 23368415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Review of randomized controlled trials: issues to consider when designing a trial.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):905-7. PubMed ID: 23726342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increasing the Impact of Randomized, Controlled Trials in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
    Elmunzer BJ
    Gastroenterology; 2015 Sep; 149(3):521-5. PubMed ID: 26226569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Harms of outcome switching in reports of randomised trials: CONSORT perspective.
    Altman DG; Moher D; Schulz KF
    BMJ; 2017 Feb; 356():j396. PubMed ID: 28196813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized, controlled trials: Gold or bronze?
    Cheng Hy
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2006 Nov; 7(9):611-2. PubMed ID: 17095430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CONSORT and clinical trial reporting: room for improvement.
    Heddle NM; Ness PM
    Transfusion; 2016 Apr; 56(4):781-3. PubMed ID: 27079308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Leaving nothing to chance: how to randomize a clinical trial.
    Toltl LJ; Arnold DM
    Transfusion; 2012 Dec; 52(12):2513-5. PubMed ID: 22670887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How They Did It: Increasing Transparency for Randomized Trial Methods.
    Brubaker L
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(4):181. PubMed ID: 27337409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Introduction to the series "Best (but Oft-Forgotten) Practices".
    Bier DM; Allison DB; Alpers DH; Astrup A; Cashman KD; Coates PM; Fukagawa NK; Klurfeld DM; Mattes RD; Uauy R
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2015 Aug; 102(2):239-40. PubMed ID: 26178729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving clinical trials in dentistry.
    Giannobile WV
    J Dent Res; 2015 Mar; 94(3 Suppl):6S-7S. PubMed ID: 25710898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The new CONSORT statement.
    Antes G
    BMJ; 2010 Mar; 340():c1432. PubMed ID: 20332507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Critical appraisal. 5. Randomised controlled trials: questions for valid evidence.
    Nelson EA
    NT Learn Curve; 1999 Jul; 3(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 10795227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Basics of designing a clinical trial: part I.
    Whitney JD
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2000 Sep; 27(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 10999963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Basics of designing a clinical trial: part II.
    Whitney JD
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2000 Nov; 27(6):293-5. PubMed ID: 11096408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Designing and undertaking randomised implementation trials: guide for researchers.
    Wolfenden L; Foy R; Presseau J; Grimshaw JM; Ivers NM; Powell BJ; Taljaard M; Wiggers J; Sutherland R; Nathan N; Williams CM; Kingsland M; Milat A; Hodder RK; Yoong SL
    BMJ; 2021 Jan; 372():m3721. PubMed ID: 33461967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to generalize efficacy results of randomized trials: recommendations based on a systematic review of possible approaches.
    Post PN; de Beer H; Guyatt GH
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):638-43. PubMed ID: 22862884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the success of masking in acupuncture trials: further insight.
    Berger VW
    Chin J Integr Med; 2011 Jul; 17(7):546. PubMed ID: 21725882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Education section - designing a "placebo" to help define the intervention.
    J Evid Based Med; 2011 Nov; 4(4):261-2. PubMed ID: 23672759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The design and analysis of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate computerized decision support in primary care: the COGENT study.
    Eccles M; Grimshaw J; Steen N; Parkin D; Purves I; McColl E; Rousseau N
    Fam Pract; 2000 Apr; 17(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 10758083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discussion of paper by Korn and Freidlin.
    Wittes J
    Am J Bioeth; 2011 Mar; 11(3):13-4. PubMed ID: 21400376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.