These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23368519)

  • 1. The probabilities of conditionals revisited.
    Douven I; Verbrugge S
    Cogn Sci; 2013; 37(4):711-30. PubMed ID: 23368519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Adams family.
    Douven I; Verbrugge S
    Cognition; 2010 Dec; 117(3):302-18. PubMed ID: 20961534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abductive conditionals as a test case for inferentialism.
    Mirabile P; Douven I
    Cognition; 2020 Jul; 200():104232. PubMed ID: 32497915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two meanings of "if"? Individual differences in the interpretation of conditionals.
    Oberauer K; Geiger SM; Fischer K; Weidenfeld A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jun; 60(6):790-819. PubMed ID: 17514595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The probability of causal conditionals.
    Over DE; Hadjichristidis C; Evans JS; Handley SJ; Sloman SA
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 Feb; 54(1):62-97. PubMed ID: 16839539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reasoning with conditionals: does every counterexample count? It's frequency that counts.
    Geiger SM; Oberauer K
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):2060-74. PubMed ID: 18265621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The probability of conditionals: A review.
    López-Astorga M; Ragni M; Johnson-Laird PN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Feb; 29(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 34173186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The causal structure of utility conditionals.
    Bonnefon JF; Sloman SA
    Cogn Sci; 2013; 37(1):193-209. PubMed ID: 23163750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.
    Weidenfeld A; Oberauer K; Hörnig R
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Nov; 58(8):1479-513. PubMed ID: 16365951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The probability of iterated conditionals.
    van Wijnbergen-Huitink J; Elqayam S; Over DE
    Cogn Sci; 2015 May; 39(4):788-803. PubMed ID: 25238396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probability in reasoning: a developmental test on conditionals.
    Barrouillet P; Gauffroy C
    Cognition; 2015 Apr; 137():22-39. PubMed ID: 25590946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reasoning with conditionals: a test of formal models of four theories.
    Oberauer K
    Cogn Psychol; 2006 Nov; 53(3):238-83. PubMed ID: 16729993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What is required for the truth of a general conditional?
    Wang M; Over D; Liang L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Nov; 75(11):2105-2117. PubMed ID: 35262439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Indicative and counterfactual 'only if' conditionals.
    Egan SM; García-Madruga JA; Byrne RM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Nov; 132(3):240-9. PubMed ID: 19695557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation into the online processing of counterfactual and indicative conditionals.
    Stewart AJ; Haigh M; Kidd E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2113-25. PubMed ID: 19565429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A ranking-theoretic approach to conditionals.
    Spohn W
    Cogn Sci; 2013 Aug; 37(6):1074-106. PubMed ID: 23927019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relevance effect and conditionals.
    Skovgaard-Olsen N; Singmann H; Klauer KC
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():26-36. PubMed ID: 26848733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Between a conditional's antecedent and its consequent: Discourse coherence vs. probabilistic relevance.
    Krzyżanowska K; Collins PJ; Hahn U
    Cognition; 2017 Jul; 164():199-205. PubMed ID: 28453997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conceptual spaces and the strength of similarity-based arguments.
    Douven I; Elqayam S; Gärdenfors P; Mirabile P
    Cognition; 2022 Jan; 218():104951. PubMed ID: 34801861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The dual reading of general conditionals: The influence of abstract versus concrete contexts.
    Wang M; Yao X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Apr; 71(4):859-869. PubMed ID: 28278574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.