These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Parental attitudes toward ethical and social issues surrounding the expansion of newborn screening using new technologies. Hasegawa LE; Fergus KA; Ojeda N; Au SM Public Health Genomics; 2011; 14(4-5):298-306. PubMed ID: 20689248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parents' Perspectives and Societal Acceptance of Implementation of Newborn Screening for SCID in the Netherlands. Blom M; Bredius RGM; Jansen ME; Weijman G; Kemper EA; Vermont CL; Hollink IHIM; Dik WA; van Montfrans JM; van Gijn ME; Henriet SS; van Aerde KJ; Koole W; Lankester AC; Dekkers EHBM; Schielen PCJI; de Vries MC; Henneman L; van der Burg M; J Clin Immunol; 2021 Jan; 41(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 33070266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parental Views on Expanded Newborn Screening Using Whole-Genome Sequencing. Joseph G; Chen F; Harris-Wai J; Puck JM; Young C; Koenig BA Pediatrics; 2016 Jan; 137 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S36-46. PubMed ID: 26729702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of pregnant women's knowledge and attitudes about newborn bloodspot screening. Fitzgerald C; Heery E; Conneally N; Linnane B; George S; Fitzpatrick P Midwifery; 2017 Feb; 45():21-27. PubMed ID: 27978478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Informed consent process in Alpha-1 testing of at-risk children: views of parents and adults tested as children. Coors ME; Moseley R; McGorray S COPD; 2011 Feb; 8(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 21299476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parental perspectives on retention and secondary use of neonatal dried bloodspots: a Dutch mixed methods study. Jansen ME; van den Bosch LJM; Hendriks MJ; Scheffer MMJ; Heijnen ML; Douglas CMW; van El CG BMC Pediatr; 2019 Jul; 19(1):230. PubMed ID: 31288776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Public attitudes regarding the use of residual newborn screening specimens for research. Botkin JR; Rothwell E; Anderson R; Stark L; Goldenberg A; Lewis M; Burbank M; Wong B Pediatrics; 2012 Feb; 129(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 22250018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parental intentions to enroll children in a voluntary expanded newborn screening program. Paquin RS; Peay HL; Gehtland LM; Lewis MA; Bailey DB Soc Sci Med; 2016 Oct; 166():17-24. PubMed ID: 27526258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating parents' decisions about next-generation sequencing for their child in the NC NEXUS (North Carolina Newborn Exome Sequencing for Universal Screening) study: a randomized controlled trial protocol. Milko LV; Rini C; Lewis MA; Butterfield RM; Lin FC; Paquin RS; Powell BC; Roche MI; Souris KJ; Bailey DB; Berg JS; Powell CM Trials; 2018 Jun; 19(1):344. PubMed ID: 29950170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed choice for newborn blood spot screening in the United Kingdom: a survey of parental perceptions. Nicholls SG; Southern KW Pediatrics; 2012 Dec; 130(6):e1527-33. PubMed ID: 23147970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stakeholder attitudes towards the role and application of informed consent for newborn bloodspot screening: a study protocol. Nicholls SG; Tessier L; Etchegary H; Brehaut JC; Potter BK; Hayeems RZ; Chakraborty P; Marcadier J; Milburn J; Pullman D; Turner L; Wilson BJ BMJ Open; 2014 Nov; 4(11):e006782. PubMed ID: 25421341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Public views on participating in newborn screening using genome sequencing. Bombard Y; Miller FA; Hayeems RZ; Barg C; Cressman C; Carroll JC; Wilson BJ; Little J; Avard D; Painter-Main M; Allanson J; Giguere Y; Chakraborty P Eur J Hum Genet; 2014 Nov; 22(11):1248-54. PubMed ID: 24549052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]