255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23369667)
1. A review of the foot function index and the foot function index - revised.
Budiman-Mak E; Conrad KJ; Mazza J; Stuck RM
J Foot Ankle Res; 2013 Feb; 6(1):5. PubMed ID: 23369667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the Turkish version of the Revised Foot Function Index for patients with foot and ankle disorders.
Yagci G; Erel S; Okunakol V
Foot Ankle Surg; 2020 Aug; 26(6):624-629. PubMed ID: 31431327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Theoretical model and Rasch analysis to develop a revised Foot Function Index.
Budiman-Mak E; Conrad K; Stuck R; Matters M
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Jul; 27(7):519-27. PubMed ID: 16842719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement properties of the Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire: A systematic review.
Cervera-Garvi P; Galan-Hurtado MH; Ortega-Avila AB; Marchena-Rodriguez A; Lopezosa-Reca E; Castillo-Dominguez A; Diaz-Miguel S
Clin Rehabil; 2024 Jun; ():2692155241258299. PubMed ID: 38856157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the validity of the Foot Function Index in measuring outcomes in patients with foot and ankle disorders.
SooHoo NF; Samimi DB; Vyas RM; Botzler T
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Jan; 27(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 16442027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Many-faceted rasch calibration of the foot function index-revised short form.
Ryu S; Casanova MP; Moore JD; Cady AC; Baker RT
J Foot Ankle Res; 2022 Oct; 15(1):77. PubMed ID: 36244972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Foot Function Index for use in German-speaking patients with foot complaints.
Naal FD; Impellizzeri FM; Huber M; Rippstein PF
Foot Ankle Int; 2008 Dec; 29(12):1222-8. PubMed ID: 19138487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Age- and Sex-Related Normative Data for the Foot Function Index in a German-Speaking Cohort.
Schneider W; Jurenitsch S
Foot Ankle Int; 2016 Nov; 37(11):1238-1242. PubMed ID: 27435183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Foot Function Index.
Huh JW; Eun IS; Ko YC; Park MJ; Hwang KM; Park SH; Park TH; Park JH
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016; 55(4):759-61. PubMed ID: 27067199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using the Oxford Foot Model to determine the association between objective measures of foot function and results of the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale and the Foot Function Index: a prospective gait analysis study in Germany.
Kostuj T; Stief F; Hartmann KA; Schaper K; Arabmotlagh M; Baums MH; Meurer A; Krummenauer F; Lieske S
BMJ Open; 2018 Apr; 8(4):e019872. PubMed ID: 29626046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement properties of the most commonly used Foot- and Ankle-Specific Questionnaires: the FFI, FAOS and FAAM. A systematic review.
Sierevelt IN; Zwiers R; Schats W; Haverkamp D; Terwee CB; Nolte PA; Kerkhoffs GMMJ
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Jul; 26(7):2059-2073. PubMed ID: 29026933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and validity of 6 measures of pain, function, and disability for ankle arthroplasty and arthrodesis.
Pinsker E; Inrig T; Daniels TR; Warmington K; Beaton DE
Foot Ankle Int; 2015 Jun; 36(6):617-25. PubMed ID: 25652665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Foot Function Index in patients with foot disorders.
Anaforoğlu Külünkoğlu B; Fırat N; Yıldız NT; Alkan A
Turk J Med Sci; 2018 Jun; 48(3):476-483. PubMed ID: 29914240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research.
Hunt KJ; Hurwit D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Aug; 95(16):e118(1-9). PubMed ID: 23965711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).
Çelik D; Malkoç M; Martin R
Rheumatol Int; 2016 Oct; 36(10):1469-76. PubMed ID: 27136921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and validity of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Clinical Rating Scale: a pilot study for the hallux and lesser toes.
Baumhauer JF; Nawoczenski DA; DiGiovanni BF; Wilding GE
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Dec; 27(12):1014-9. PubMed ID: 17207425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for use in patients with foot or ankle diseases.
Jia Y; Huang H; Gagnier JJ
Qual Life Res; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1969-2010. PubMed ID: 28315178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity and reliability of the Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire Brazilian-Portuguese version.
Martinez BR; Staboli IM; Kamonseki DH; Budiman-Mak E; Yi LC
Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):1810. PubMed ID: 27812449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Dutch-language patient-reported outcome measures for foot and ankle injuries; a systematic review].
Weel H; Zwiers R; Sierevelt IN; Haverkamp D; van Dijk CN; Kerkhoffs GM
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2015; 159():A8831. PubMed ID: 26271167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
