BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23370564)

  • 1. Audiologic and surgical outcomes of a novel, nonpercutaneous, bone conducting hearing implant.
    Sylvester DC; Gardner R; Reilly PG; Rankin K; Raine CH
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jul; 34(5):922-6. PubMed ID: 23370564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss.
    Ihler F; Volbers L; Blum J; Matthias C; Canis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 24448279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparative Study of Audiologic Outcomes for Two Transcutaneous Bone-Anchored Hearing Devices.
    Powell HR; Rolfe AM; Birman CS
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(9):1525-31. PubMed ID: 26375976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Indication criteria and outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant.
    Riss D; Arnoldner C; Baumgartner WD; Blineder M; Flak S; Bachner A; Gstoettner W; Hamzavi JS
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Dec; 124(12):2802-6. PubMed ID: 25142577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The efficacy of unilateral bone-anchored hearing devices in Chinese Mandarin-speaking patients with bilateral aural atresia.
    Fan Y; Zhang Y; Wang P; Wang Z; Zhu X; Yang H; Chen X
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Apr; 140(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 24503772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postoperative validation of bone-anchored implants in the single-sided deafness population.
    Snapp H; Angeli S; Telischi FF; Fabry D
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 22314919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone-anchored hearing aid system application for unilateral congenital conductive hearing impairment: audiometric results.
    Kunst SJ; Leijendeckers JM; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jan; 29(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 18199951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes after Application of Active Bone Conducting Implants.
    Koro E; Werner M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(4):197-205. PubMed ID: 31499490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strategies of active middle ear implants for hearing rehabilitation in congenital aural atresia.
    Verhaert N; Fuchsmann C; Tringali S; Lina-Granade G; Truy E
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):639-45. PubMed ID: 21436753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
    Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Sophono bone-conduction system: Surgical, audiologic, and quality-of-life outcomes.
    Mclean T; Pai I; Philipatos A; Gordon M
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Jul; 96(7):E28-E33. PubMed ID: 28719716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new semi-implantable transcutaneous bone conduction device: clinical, surgical, and audiologic outcomes in patients with congenital ear canal atresia.
    Siegert R; Kanderske J
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jul; 34(5):927-34. PubMed ID: 23770689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term results with the titanium bone-anchored hearing aid: the U.S. experience.
    Wazen JJ; Caruso M; Tjellstrom A
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):737-41. PubMed ID: 9831146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of 2 implantable bone conduction devices in patients with single-sided deafness using a daily alternating method.
    Desmet JB; Wouters K; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):1018-26. PubMed ID: 22772008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fully implantable hearing aids in patients with congenital auricular atresia.
    Siegert R; Mattheis S; Kasic J
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Feb; 117(2):336-40. PubMed ID: 17277630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Audiological Results Between a Transcutaneous and a Percutaneous Bone Conduction Instrument in Conductive Hearing Loss.
    Gerdes T; Salcher RB; Schwab B; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jul; 37(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 27093021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The bone-anchored hearing aid in the rehabilitation of single-sided deafness: experience with 58 patients.
    Martin TP; Lowther R; Cooper H; Holder RL; Irving RM; Reid AP; Proops DW
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2010 Aug; 35(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 20738337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audiological and subjective benefit results in bone-anchored hearing device users.
    Boleas-Aguirre MS; Bulnes Plano MD; de Erenchun Lasa IR; Ibáñez Beroiz B
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 22472615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative headband assessment for semi-implantable bone conduction hearing devices in conductive hearing loss: is it useful or misleading?
    Rainsbury JW; Williams BA; Gulliver M; Morris DP
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):e58-62. PubMed ID: 25548890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Bonebridge: preclinical evaluation of a new transcutaneously-activated bone anchored hearing device.
    Huber AM; Sim JH; Xie YZ; Chatzimichalis M; Ullrich O; Röösli C
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():93-9. PubMed ID: 23467173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.